2012
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A robust model for read count data in exome sequencing experiments and implications for copy number variant calling

Abstract: Motivation: Exome sequencing has proven to be an effective tool to discover the genetic basis of Mendelian disorders. It is well established that copy number variants (CNVs) contribute to the etiology of these disorders. However, calling CNVs from exome sequence data is challenging. A typical read depth strategy consists of using another sample (or a combination of samples) as a reference to control for the variability at the capture and sequencing steps. However, technical variability between samples complica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
550
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 571 publications
(566 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
550
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The detection of large variants from NGS data has been shown previously, but its use in FH diagnostics has not yet been investigated. 20,21 Here, the combination of SureSelect Target Enrichment System/ HiSeq and data analysis using ExomeDepth software 18 led to correct identification of all eight large deletions and one large duplication. This shows the potential of using hybrid capture for the detection of both short and large sequence variants in FH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The detection of large variants from NGS data has been shown previously, but its use in FH diagnostics has not yet been investigated. 20,21 Here, the combination of SureSelect Target Enrichment System/ HiSeq and data analysis using ExomeDepth software 18 led to correct identification of all eight large deletions and one large duplication. This shows the potential of using hybrid capture for the detection of both short and large sequence variants in FH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A read depth-based method, 18 as implemented in R package ExomeDepth, was used to identify deletions and duplications spanning at least one exon. Each sequencing batch of samples was processed separately to increase the quality of a reference set for each sample and therefore to maximize the power to detect CNVs.…”
Section: Copy-number Variant Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 The analysis revealed an average of 137 copy number variations per exome (n=32). No copy number variations were deemed potential candidates either because of a high allele frequency or a lack of expression or functional role of the gene within the megakaryocyte/platelet lineage.…”
Section: Initial Wes Analysis Focused On Comparison With a Panel Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, the recent advent of the NGS technologies has been accompanied by the implementation of new bioinformatic tools to detect copy number variants (CNVs) from the depth of read mapping, even after applying specific targeted enrichment 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. Most of these new tools are based on the assumption that differences in the depth of coverage among specific genomic regions and across multiple samples can be used as an indicator of the relative number of copies, resulting in a semiquantitative estimation of CNVs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%