2009
DOI: 10.1109/tcomm.2009.0901.070041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A robust metric for soft-output detection in the presence of class-A noise

Abstract: Abstract-Digital communications over channels impaired by impulse noise are considered. We first address the problem from an information-theoretical viewpoint, discussing the performance limits imposed by the channel model. Then, we describe and compare a couple of practical communication schemes employing powerful channel codes and iterative decoding, with focus on a very simple and robust detection scheme that does not require the estimation of the statistics of the impulse noise.Index Terms-Impulse noise, s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(38 reference statements)
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the computational cost for JEVA is high and becomes unmanageable for long codelengths. Fertonani and Colavolpe [10] made a similar conclusion for low-density parity-check codes with iterative decoding based on a robust (against impusive noise) soft decoding metric, which can be obtained by simply clipping the Gaussian noise metric. However, a systematic way to choose the clipping threshold is unavailabe in [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the computational cost for JEVA is high and becomes unmanageable for long codelengths. Fertonani and Colavolpe [10] made a similar conclusion for low-density parity-check codes with iterative decoding based on a robust (against impusive noise) soft decoding metric, which can be obtained by simply clipping the Gaussian noise metric. However, a systematic way to choose the clipping threshold is unavailabe in [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Fertonani and Colavolpe [10] made a similar conclusion for low-density parity-check codes with iterative decoding based on a robust (against impusive noise) soft decoding metric, which can be obtained by simply clipping the Gaussian noise metric. However, a systematic way to choose the clipping threshold is unavailabe in [10]. In [11], by interpreting the Viterbi algorithm with a clipped Euclidean metric as a special form of JEVA that can mark a varying number of erasures, the so-called metric erasure Viterbi algorithm (MEVA) was proposed and a systematic way to choose the clipping threshold was derived by assuming the impulsive noise probability is close to 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From Fourier analysis, the behavior of the characteristic function for in the neighborhood of zero governs the tail probability of the random envelope. Thus to accurately model the tails, we approximate for in the neighborhood of zero , such that (15) reduces to (18) When is Rayleigh distributed, e.g., for constant amplitude modulated transmissions in Rayleigh fading environment, then and the expression in (18) is exact. We now simplify for the following bounded and unbounded pathloss functions.…”
Section: Joint Statistics Of Interferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…5), while the estimate of the parameter P B is not. We point out that the estimate of the parameter R may be much less critical, or even not critical at all, when blind detection schemes are used instead of the FBA -this point is addressed in [17], [18] for channels with γ = 1. In the following, since we are here mainly interested in the impact of the parameter γ, it is assumed that correct information on all other channel parameters is available.…”
Section: B Mismatched Decodingmentioning
confidence: 99%