A robust linear MPC approach to online generation of 3D biped walking motion

Abstract

International audienceA crucial part in biped walking motion generation is to ensure dynamic feasibility, which takes the form of a nonlinear constraint in the general case. Our proposition is to bound the nonlinear part of the dynamic feasibility constraint between some properly chosen extreme values. Making sure that this constraint is satisfied for the extreme values guarantees its satisfaction for all possible values in between. This follows a classical approach from robust nonlinear control theory, which is to consider a nonlinear dynamical system as a specific selection of a time-invariant Linear Differential Inclusion. As a result, dynamic feasibility can be imposed by using only linear constraints, which can be included in an efficient linear MPC scheme, to generate 3D walking motions online. Our simulation results show two major achievements: 1) walking motions over uneven ground such as stairs can be generated online, with guaranteed kinematic and dynamic feasibility, 2) walking on flat ground is significantly improved, with a 3D motion of the CoM closely resembling the one observed in humans

Model predictive control of biped walking with bounded uncertainties

“…In [4] and [21] it is proposed a robust approach to handle bounded model errors. The reference motion is optimized to satisfy the system constraints for any possible value of error within these bounds.…”

Adaptive step duration in biped walking: A robust approach to nonlinear constraints

“…It is similar to what was done in [11], [12] for the problem of adapting the vertical motion of the CoM of the robot: we design constraints that are robust to changes in the variable that introduces the nonlinearity. To do so, we make sure the constraints are feasible over a given interval of this variable.…”

Learning Feasibility Constraints for Multicontact Locomotion of Legged Robots

“…Starting with [16], various optimal control formulation have been proposed by the community, to either tackle the robustness problem [30], include viability conditions [25], allow altitude variations of the center of mass (CoM) [2], or also include foot placements as parameters of the problem [11].…”