2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12667-019-00351-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A robust least square approach for forecasting models: an application to Brazil’s natural gas demand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We, therefore, base the long-term relationship on ROB-L 2 , as used by Costa et al (2019) for forecasting Brazil's natural gas and ARDL techniques are used to check the short-run effects of the variables. The ARDL approach possesses several econometric strengths compared with the conventional time-series data models.…”
Section: Econometric Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We, therefore, base the long-term relationship on ROB-L 2 , as used by Costa et al (2019) for forecasting Brazil's natural gas and ARDL techniques are used to check the short-run effects of the variables. The ARDL approach possesses several econometric strengths compared with the conventional time-series data models.…”
Section: Econometric Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the forecast, the authors propose alternative energy policies. Robust least square method combined with log-linear Cobb-Douglas model has been proposed by [15]. The authors compared the proposed robust and ordinary least square methods for the yearly forecast of the natural gas demand in Brazil, considering the total demand as well as the industrial and power sectors demand.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LS method yields superior results and presents reasonable long-term elasticity concerning natural resource demand for energy consumption forecasts [39]. The LS method is extensively employed in forecasting in Asia, including China [40][41][42][43][44], Turkey [45], and Korea [46,47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%