2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c01892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Robust Hydrogen-Bonded Metal–Organic Framework with Enhanced Ethane Uptake and Selectivity

Abstract: Selective adsorption of trace C2H6 over C2H4 is important for the industrial purification of polymer-grade C2H4 (>99.95% purity). For practical applications, potential adsorbents show high structural stability while maintaining elevated C2H6 adsorption even at low pressures. Herein, we report a C2H6-selective metal–organic framework (MOF), viz., Co­(AIN)2 (HAIN = 3-aminoisonicotinic acid), with a twofold interpenetrated dia structure. Compared to an isoreticular and unstable Co­(IN)2 (HIN = isonicotinic acid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remarkably, each one of them displayed an evidently higher uptake capacity toward C 2 H 6 than toward C 2 H 4 at the low-pressure region, despite comparable amounts being adsorbed at atmospheric pressure. A similar adsorption situation was also observed for the reported MOFs such as MAF-49, 29 Co(AIN) 2 , 30 and Ni(IN) 2 . 31 At 298 K and the partial pressure of 0.1 atm typically encountered in actual mixed gas, the gravimetric uptake capacities of C 2 H 6 reach 51 cm 3 (STP) g −1 for NJU-Bai7, 53 cm 3 (STP) g −1 for ZJNU-21, 40 cm 3 (STP) g −1 for ZJNU-22, and 49 cm 3 (STP) g −1 for ZJNU-23, which surpass those of most C 2 H 6 -selective MOFs documented so far under identical conditions such as Ni(bdc)(ted) 0.5 [10.9 cm 3 (STP) g −1 ], 32 DUT-52(Hf) [17.2 cm 3 (STP) g −1 ], 33 Dia-4-Ni [25.6 cm 3 (STP) g −1 ], 34 and Fe 2 (BDP) 3 [26.2 cm 3 (STP) g −1 ], 35 indicating their excellent performance for trapping lowconcentration C 2 H 6 (Figure 3h).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Remarkably, each one of them displayed an evidently higher uptake capacity toward C 2 H 6 than toward C 2 H 4 at the low-pressure region, despite comparable amounts being adsorbed at atmospheric pressure. A similar adsorption situation was also observed for the reported MOFs such as MAF-49, 29 Co(AIN) 2 , 30 and Ni(IN) 2 . 31 At 298 K and the partial pressure of 0.1 atm typically encountered in actual mixed gas, the gravimetric uptake capacities of C 2 H 6 reach 51 cm 3 (STP) g −1 for NJU-Bai7, 53 cm 3 (STP) g −1 for ZJNU-21, 40 cm 3 (STP) g −1 for ZJNU-22, and 49 cm 3 (STP) g −1 for ZJNU-23, which surpass those of most C 2 H 6 -selective MOFs documented so far under identical conditions such as Ni(bdc)(ted) 0.5 [10.9 cm 3 (STP) g −1 ], 32 DUT-52(Hf) [17.2 cm 3 (STP) g −1 ], 33 Dia-4-Ni [25.6 cm 3 (STP) g −1 ], 34 and Fe 2 (BDP) 3 [26.2 cm 3 (STP) g −1 ], 35 indicating their excellent performance for trapping lowconcentration C 2 H 6 (Figure 3h).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…At the temperature of 298 K, the K H values of C 2 H 6 and C 2 H 4 are 0.344 and 0.239 mmol g −1 kPa −1 for NJU-Bai7 (Figure S18), 0.503 and 0.338 mmol g −1 kPa −1 for ZJNU-21 (Figure S19), 0.322 and 0.254 mmol g −1 kPa −1 for ZJNU-22 (Figure S20), and 0.467 and 0.403 mmol g −1 kPa −1 for ZJNU-23 (Figure S21), respectively. 4g), such as MUF-15 (1.95), 38 DUT-52(Hf) (1.9), 33 PCN-250 (1.9), 39 NUM-7 (1.764), 40 Dia-4-Ni (1.76), 34 Ca(H 2 tcpb) (1.67), 41 CPM-233 (1.64), 42 NUM-9 (1.61), 43 JNU-2 (1.6), 44 SNNU-40 (1.58), 45 LIFM-63 (1.56), 46 JXNU-9 (1.53), 47 MIL-53-NDCA (1.53), 48 Sc-BPDC (1.5), 49 MIL-142A (1.5), 50 Azole-Th-1 (1.44), 51 UPC-612 (1.41), 52 In-soc-MOF-1 (1.4), 53 NPU-1 (1.32), 54 MOF-545 (1.31), 55 and CPOC-301 (1.3), 56 but is inferior to that of a few high-performance C 2 H 6 -selective coordination framework compounds like Fe 2 O 2 (dobdc) (4.4), 36 Cu(Qc) 2 (3.4), 57 Co(AIN) 2 (2.96), 30 ZJU-120 (2.74), 58 MAF-49 (2.7), 29 and NKMOF-8-Br (2.65). 59 As shown in Figures S26−S29, the adsorption selectivity of C 2 H 6 over C 2 H 4 increases with the decreasing measurement temperatures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…14,15 Indeed, as a result of the successful implementation of nonpolar pore properties by sophisticated design, C 2 H 6 -selective adsorbents based on MOFs, COFs, HOFs, and porous organic cages have been developed in recent years. 5–8,11,13,16–20 However, because they exhibit poor structural stability and problems with large-scale synthesis, it is necessary to develop a suitable porous material that lacks the shortcomings of existing materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A notable one is the iron-peroxo sites in Fe 2 O 2 (dobdc) showed a strong affinity toward C 2 H 6 with an uptake capacity of 3.3 mmol/g and high C 2 H 6 /C 2 H 4 IAST selectivity of 4.4 at 1 bar and 298 K. [31] Besides the polar functional sites, nonpolar moieties (e. g., featuring aromatic or aliphatic moieties) in the pore walls of a MOF can endow stronger coupling with ethane through Van der Waals force. [32,33] Although the above methods are conducive to obtaining C 2 H 6 -selective MOFs, the performance of these materials is still suffers from poor selectivity(1.3-3.0) and low ethane uptake. [34][35][36][37][38] Therefore, effort should also be devoted to seeking C 2 H 6 -selective adsorbents with superior separation performance, stability, and low cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%