2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.12.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A robust hybrid approach based on particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm to minimize the total machine load on unrelated parallel machines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, Cheng & Huang (2017) relied on the elitist strategy to create the next generation based on the top 10% of paternal chromosomes with the best offspring chromosomes. While the Mir & Rezaeian (2016) utilized two selection methods to create the new generation roulette wheel selection method and tournament selection procedure. Moreover, the chromosomes with the highest fitness values receive the highest probability of creating the next generation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, Cheng & Huang (2017) relied on the elitist strategy to create the next generation based on the top 10% of paternal chromosomes with the best offspring chromosomes. While the Mir & Rezaeian (2016) utilized two selection methods to create the new generation roulette wheel selection method and tournament selection procedure. Moreover, the chromosomes with the highest fitness values receive the highest probability of creating the next generation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TAFOA [3] and a multi-pass heuristic (MPH) [7] are chosen as comparative algorithm because they can be directly used to solve UPMSPR with PM. Salehi Mir and Rezaeian [47] presented a hybrid particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm (HPSOGA), which can be directly applied to our UPMSPR after the decoding procedure of ABC-AC is adopted; therefore, we selected it as a comparative algorithm.…”
Section: Test Instances and Comparative Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ABC has following parameters: N = 100 and Limit = 8. Parameter settings of three comparative algorithms are directly selected from references [3,7,47] except that the stopping condition. We also test these settings for each comparative algorithm by Taguchi method.…”
Section: Parameter Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A problem with deteriorating job effects, where processing times of jobs increases after they are released into the system, is analysed in [194]. The authors apply a GA, PSO, and a hybrid method which combines the previous two metaheuristics.…”
Section: B Metaheuristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A complete classification of the reviewer research including the problem variant, solution method, and short notes is given in Table V. R|R|Cmax heuristics matheuristics that combine mathematical programming with heuristic procedures [85] R|R|Cmax heuristics two heuristic types, one which consider resources when scheduling, and the second which does not and then performs a repair mechanism [86] R||T EC heuristic jobs have an electricity consumption rate when executing, and electricity prices are changing during the time horizon [87] R|sij , Mj | Tj heuristic, CLONALG, VND, GRASP several novel heuristics adapted for the considered, CLONALG combined with VNS and GRASP problem [88] R||Cmax GA, TS, SA, ID, MDDR GA with neighbourhood operators, initialisation of starting solutions with MCT [89] R||Cmax descent method, TS greedy initialisation [90] R||Cmax, Tmax TS bi-criteria optimisation [91] R||Cmax TS TS with hashing for control of tabu restrictions [92] R|s ijk , s − batch| Tj SA setup times are not considered between jobs belonging to the same batch [93] R|s R||Cmax GA matrix encoding of solutions [133] R|s ijk |Cmax GA, SA dominance properties included in the metaheuristics [134] R||Cmax VND combination od VND with a commercial solver [135] R||Cmax VND problem where not all machines and jobs need to be considered for scheduling [136] R|s ijk |Cmax GA combination of GA with local search operators [137] R|s ijk | Tj IG IG with destruction and reconstruction operators [138] R|s IG algorithm for multi-objective optimisation and integration with concepts from TS [187] R|s ijk | Tj GA, SA SA embedded in GA as a local search procedure [188] R|M d |Cmax GA machines deteriorate over time, but can be fixed with maintenance activities [189] R|s ijk |Cmax GA, heuristic GA coupled with LS [190] R|s ijk , Mj | Fj GA, MDDRs GA which sequences jobs and a DR that assigns them to machines [191] R|s ijk , Mj , brkdwn, rj , batch| wj Cj + wj Tj TS [192] R|sij , Mj , rj , prec|T LT GA GA coupled with the SA solution acceptance test [193] R|rj | wj Tj , Cmax MDDR, heuristic, TS TS and heuristic adapted for bi-criteria optimisation [194] R|rj , s ijk , pc| Fj GA, PSO a hybrid metaheuristic combining PSO and GA [195] R|rj , sij , Mj , prec, R|Cmax GA,...…”
Section: Constraints Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%