2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2014.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A robust global and local mixture distance based non-rigid point set registration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
79
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SIFT [11], SURF [13], CPD [25], GLMDTPS [30], RSOC [21], totally five state-of-the-art methods are compared against our method in the experiments. These methods can mainly categorize into three types based on the methods of feature extraction.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…SIFT [11], SURF [13], CPD [25], GLMDTPS [30], RSOC [21], totally five state-of-the-art methods are compared against our method in the experiments. These methods can mainly categorize into three types based on the methods of feature extraction.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Ma et al proposed a robust L 2 -minimizing estimate (L 2 E) [28] for non-rigid point set registration, they later proposed a flexible and general algorithm called locally linear transforming (LLT) [29] for both rigid and non-rigid registration on remote sensing images. More recently, Yang et al [30] proposed a new method named GLMDTPS, which considers global and local structural differences as a linear assignment problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The extracted feature points contain a large number of outliers that limit the performance of current non-rigid point set registration algorithms [29][30][31]. For this issue, a robust multi-feature guided model is designed-given two point sets A = {a n } N n=1 (i.e., the source point set) and B = {b m } M m=1 (i.e., the target point set) which are extracted from the sensed image and the reference image, respectively.…”
Section: Multi-feature Guided Point Set Registration Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CPD (coherent point drift) [29], GLMDTPS (global and local mixture distance with thin plate spline transformation) [30], SIFT (scale invariant feature transform) [38] and SURF (speeded-up robust features) [39], four state-of-the-art methods, are compared against our method in the following experiments. SIFT and SURF methods used the open source VLFeat toolbox with the threshold 1 and the Matlab open source OpenSURF function with the default setting, respectively.…”
Section: Experiments Designmentioning
confidence: 99%