A robust flow cytometry-based biomass monitoring tool enables rapid at-line characterization of S. cerevisiae physiology during continuous bioprocessing of spent sulfite liquor

Abstract

Assessment of viable biomass is challenging in bioprocesses involving complex media with distinct biomass and media particle populations. Biomass monitoring in these circumstances usually requires elaborate offline methods or sophisticated inline sensors. Reliable monitoring tools in an at-line capacity represent a promising alternative but are still scarce to date. In this study, a flow cytometry-based method for biomass monitoring in spent sulfite liquor medium as feedstock for second generation bioethanol production with yeast was developed. The method is capable of (i) yeast cell quantification against medium background, (ii) determination of yeast viability, and (iii) assessment of yeast physiology though morphological analysis of the budding division process. Thus, enhanced insight into physiology and morphology is provided which is not accessible through common online and offline biomass monitoring methods. To demonstrate the capabilities of this method, firstly, a continuous ethanol fermentation process of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with filtered and unfiltered spent sulfite liquor media was analyzed. Subsequently, at-line process monitoring of viability in a retentostat cultivation was conducted. The obtained information was used for a simple control based on addition of essential nutrients in relation to viability. Thereby, inter-dependencies between nutrient supply, physiology, and specific ethanol productivity that are essential for process design could be illuminated. Keywords Sustainable bioprocess solution. Yeast morphology. Viable/non-viable biomass populations. Particle background. Complex medium. Continuous bioprocessing with cell retention Published in the topical collection Advances in Process Analytics and Control Technology with guest editor Christoph Herwig. Charlotte Anne Vees and Lukas Veiter contributed equally to this work.

Single-Cell Technologies to Understand the Mechanisms of Cellular Adaptation in Chemostats

“…Traditionally, flow cytometry has been used to address heterogeneity in bioprocesses including chemostats (Hewitt et al, 1998(Hewitt et al, , 1999Delvigne et al, 2015;Heins et al, 2019;Vees et al, 2020). Populations differentiated by structural or physiological cell parameters can be revealed based on optical signals from, e.g., staining dyes or biosensors.…”

Towards continuous industrial bioprocessing with solventogenic and acetogenic clostridia: challenges, progress and perspectives

“…Using membrane filtration, biomass is increased by holding back the cells by a hollow-fiber membrane module (see Fig. 2 b) [ 62 , 222 , 308 ]. The growth rate in the retentostat can be controlled by the value of bleed flow [ 185 ].…”

“…Therefore, inactive cells and even substrate particles accumulate equally in the reactor. Consequently, an increase in biomass concentration does not necessarily lead to a proportional increase in productivity [ 308 ]. A major approach is the viability monitoring of the cell population and differentiation between cells and background particles via rapid at-line tools such as flow cytometry [ 291 , 308 ].…”

Application of In-Situ and Soft-Sensors for Estimation of Recombinant P. pastoris GS115 Biomass Concentration: A Case Analysis of HBcAg (Mut+) and HBsAg (MutS) Production Processes under Varying Conditions

“…Literally microbial biomass concentration is expressed as a mass or number of cells attributed to liquid sample volume (e.g., g/L, kg/m 3 , cells/mL, cells/m 3 , etc.). Common direct off-line biomass concentration analysis methods include gravimetric dry/wet cell weight measurements and cell counting with chemocytometers [ 9 ], Coulter counters [ 10 ] and flow-cytometers [ 11 ]. These direct analyses are usually calibrated to instrumental methods to speed up the biomass measurement, improve reliability, and for automation purposes.…”