MIPPR 2013: Pattern Recognition and Computer Vision 2013
DOI: 10.1117/12.2031615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A robust feature-based registration method of multimodal image using phase congruency and coherent point drift

Abstract: This paper presents a new feature matching algorithm for nonrigid multimodal image registration. The proposed algorithm first constructs phase congruency representations (PCR) of images to be registered. Then scale invariant feature transform (SIFT) method is applied to capture significant feature points from PCR. Subsequently, the putative matching is obtained by the nearest neighbour matching in the SIFT descriptor space. The SIFT descriptor is then integrated into Coherent Point Drift (CPD) method so that t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The network architecture consists of five convolution layers followed by three dense layers, eventually predicting the rotation, scale and translation of T . We are using CNN variants of conventional registration approaches [12,13]…”
Section: Coarse Fusion Network (Cfn)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The network architecture consists of five convolution layers followed by three dense layers, eventually predicting the rotation, scale and translation of T . We are using CNN variants of conventional registration approaches [12,13]…”
Section: Coarse Fusion Network (Cfn)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feature-based approaches use image features such as landmark points, lines, and surfaces for registration, whereas intensity-based approaches use scalar values in the image pixels or voxels for performing registration [27]. The main steps involved in performing image registration are feature detection [28], feature matching [29], transformation [30] of source image into target image, and the optimization procedure [31]. In feature detection and matching steps, interested locations in the images (closed boundary regions, edges, contours, line intersections, corners, etc) are first detected and then a correspondence is made between the detected features.…”
Section: Integrating Information From Different Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the typical features-based methods, structural features-based methods can extract more robust common features from different modalities and are less sensitive to the contrast differences. Due to these advantages, they have been successfully applied to multimodal image registration [10,21,[28][29][30][31][32][33]. As a valid structural feature extraction method, phase congruency was proposed by Morrone et al [34], which is the ratio of local energy to the overall path length taken by the local Fourier components in reaching the endpoint.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wong and Orchard [29] constructed local phase-coherent representations of images and applied their method to multimodal medical image registration successfully. Xia et al [30] combined phase congruency representations of images with scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) to achieve multimodal medical image registration. Recently, Liu et al [31] proposed mean local phase angle (MLPA) and frequency spread phase congruency (FSPC) by using local frequency information on Log-Gabor wavelet transformation space, which improved the robustness compared with traditional multimodal matching.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%