2014
DOI: 10.5815/ijigsp.2014.08.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Robust Face Recognition System in Image and Video

Abstract: Face detection and recognition has always been one of the research interests to researchers in the field of the biometric identification of individuals. Problems such as environmental lighting, different skin color, complex background, etc affect on the detection and recognition of individuals. This paper proposes a method to enhance the performance of face detection and recognition systems. Our method, basically consists of two main parts: firstly, we detect faces and then recognize the detected faces. In the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another one is Sharma and Sachdeva [41] who obtained an accuracy value of 98.7% by utilizing SVM as a classifier for face recognition. Prakash and Singh [42] reviewed numerous papers and concluded that SVM has a more effective technique than the others and SVM can be trained successfully for face recognition and SVM is also a better learning algorithm compare to the nearest center approach in terms of face recognition, And the last, P. S. Hiremath et al [43] and A. Tofighi et al [44] have been comparing the SVM and K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) for face recognition and got the result that SVM performs better than KNN with the scores are 99.2% on 3D face recognition [43] and 93.5% on recognizing the face of an image and a video [44].…”
Section: Final Model Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another one is Sharma and Sachdeva [41] who obtained an accuracy value of 98.7% by utilizing SVM as a classifier for face recognition. Prakash and Singh [42] reviewed numerous papers and concluded that SVM has a more effective technique than the others and SVM can be trained successfully for face recognition and SVM is also a better learning algorithm compare to the nearest center approach in terms of face recognition, And the last, P. S. Hiremath et al [43] and A. Tofighi et al [44] have been comparing the SVM and K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) for face recognition and got the result that SVM performs better than KNN with the scores are 99.2% on 3D face recognition [43] and 93.5% on recognizing the face of an image and a video [44].…”
Section: Final Model Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both single and multiple faces are detected and the face(s) need not to be part of starting frame/image in the video sequence. Dilation and erosion [2] operations are applied on the detected face(s) to obtain borders. FAST (Features from Accelerated Segment Test) features [3] and Harris corner points [4] are extracted from ROI and borders.…”
Section: Work Description and Organization Of The Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wiener filter is one of the most powerful noise removal approach [9], which has been used in several applications. Dilation and erosion are morphological operations [2] that are dual to each other i.e. erosion operation shortens foreground, and expands background; dilation operation expands foreground and shortens background.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SVM is basicaly designed to perform binary classification. For multiple classes SVM is constructed using K-problems like one-against-one, one-against-all, the time compexsity of both approach is same, where the evaluation of K class changes for one-againstone(requires K-1 SVM), and for one-against-all(requires K SVM) [12] [16]. In our expirement we use one-againsall method with liner SVM classifiction.…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%