2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.124979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A robust electrospun separator modified with in situ grown metal-organic frameworks for lithium-sulfur batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since adsorption is the first step in catalysis, the calculated binding energies of adsorption can be used to interpret the affinity for different polysulfide intermediates. There are bifunctional modes for the interaction between MOFs and the polysulfides due to electronegativity differences, [49] where Li + ions bind with O atoms and S n 2− prefer to interact with cobalt or nickel metal centers (Figures S14 and S15, Supporting Information), respectively. The calculated binding energies of the long polysulfides (Li 2 S 8 , Li 2 S 6 , and Li 2 S 4 ) with Ni-MOF are higher than that of the Co-MOF, whereas the binding energies of the short sulfur species (Li 2 S and Li 2 S 2 ) with the Co-MOF are higher than that of the Ni-MOF (Figure 5a).…”
Section: Thermodynamically Understand the Catalytical Discrepanciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since adsorption is the first step in catalysis, the calculated binding energies of adsorption can be used to interpret the affinity for different polysulfide intermediates. There are bifunctional modes for the interaction between MOFs and the polysulfides due to electronegativity differences, [49] where Li + ions bind with O atoms and S n 2− prefer to interact with cobalt or nickel metal centers (Figures S14 and S15, Supporting Information), respectively. The calculated binding energies of the long polysulfides (Li 2 S 8 , Li 2 S 6 , and Li 2 S 4 ) with Ni-MOF are higher than that of the Co-MOF, whereas the binding energies of the short sulfur species (Li 2 S and Li 2 S 2 ) with the Co-MOF are higher than that of the Ni-MOF (Figure 5a).…”
Section: Thermodynamically Understand the Catalytical Discrepanciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As displayed in Table S2, most nanofibrous separators demonstrated a monotone function of suppressing the shuttle effect without protecting Li metal. Although there emerges a study [38] on using the nanofibrous separator to protect Li metal, our Janus separator shows a better performance in terms of the longer cycle life. In other words, the Janus separator from our study proposes an innovative separator design to simultaneously addressing the two critical issues of LiÀ S batteries, that is, shuttle effect and Li dendrite growth.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…reported a double‐layer nanofiber membrane to replace them. [ 112 ] The main material of the membrane was polyacrylonitrile (PAN), where a cobalt‐based MOF and rGO were located on both sides by in situ growth. Figure 12b exhibits the formation process of the MOF–PAN/rGO–PAN separator.…”
Section: The Application Of Mofs In the Separator Of Lsbsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that the commercial polyolefin separators commonly used in LSBs have poor mechanical properties and are not resistant to high temperatures, Zhou et al reported a double-layer nanofiber membrane to replace them. [112] The main material of the membrane was polyacrylonitrile (PAN), where a cobalt-based MOF and rGO were located on both sides by in situ growth. Figure 12b exhibits the formation process of the MOF-PAN/rGO-PAN separator.…”
Section: Composite With Graphenementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation