2019
DOI: 10.3390/app9071332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Robust Brain MRI Segmentation and Bias Field Correction Method Integrating Local Contextual Information into a Clustering Model

Abstract: The segmentation results of brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have important guiding significance for subsequent clinical diagnosis and treatment. However, brain MRI segmentation is a complex and challenging problem due to the inevitable noise or intensity inhomogeneity. A novel robust clustering with local contextual information (RC_LCI) model was used in this study which accurately segmented brain MRI corrupted by noise and intensity inhomogeneity. For pixels in the neighborhood of the central pixel, a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many segmentation methods have been presented by researchers to segment MRI images corrupted by intensity inhomogeneity, noise, and so on. These methods can be divided into several mainly categories: boundary-based methods [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ], threshold-based methods [ 20 , 21 , 22 ], clustering methods [ 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ], region growing methods [ 28 , 29 ], graph cuts methods [ 30 , 31 , 32 ] and deep learning method [ 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many segmentation methods have been presented by researchers to segment MRI images corrupted by intensity inhomogeneity, noise, and so on. These methods can be divided into several mainly categories: boundary-based methods [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ], threshold-based methods [ 20 , 21 , 22 ], clustering methods [ 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ], region growing methods [ 28 , 29 ], graph cuts methods [ 30 , 31 , 32 ] and deep learning method [ 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%