2019
DOI: 10.1177/0734242x19865340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A robust bi-objective multi-trip periodic capacitated arc routing problem for urban waste collection using a multi-objective invasive weed optimization

Abstract: Urban waste collection is one of the principal processes in municipalities with large expenses and laborious operations. Among the important issues raised in this regard, the lack of awareness of the exact amount of generated waste makes difficulties in the processes of collection, transportation and disposal. To this end, investigating the waste collection issue under uncertainty can play a key role in the decision-making process of managers. This paper addresses a novel robust bi-objective multi-trip periodi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since there are some major limitations in the study, future research directions can be designed accordingly. In the following, the most important recommendations are given: 1) Considering a time horizon to fulfill the demand of customers [25], 2) Extending the problem considering more real-world assumptions, such as time windows constraint [26], 3) Applying uncertainty techniques to study the uncertain nature of the parameters, such as fuzzy programming [27][28] and robust optimization [29][30], 4) Developing other algorithms to evaluate the performance of the proposed GA, such as runner root algorithm (RRA) [31], particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm [32] and cuckoo optimization algorithm (COA) [33]. 5) Considering other objectives (e.g., pollution minimization [34]) and applying efficient multiobjective meta-heuristic algorithms, such as non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm III (NSGA-III) [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since there are some major limitations in the study, future research directions can be designed accordingly. In the following, the most important recommendations are given: 1) Considering a time horizon to fulfill the demand of customers [25], 2) Extending the problem considering more real-world assumptions, such as time windows constraint [26], 3) Applying uncertainty techniques to study the uncertain nature of the parameters, such as fuzzy programming [27][28] and robust optimization [29][30], 4) Developing other algorithms to evaluate the performance of the proposed GA, such as runner root algorithm (RRA) [31], particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm [32] and cuckoo optimization algorithm (COA) [33]. 5) Considering other objectives (e.g., pollution minimization [34]) and applying efficient multiobjective meta-heuristic algorithms, such as non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm III (NSGA-III) [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem is solved through a hybrid algorithme (heuristic algorithme and (SA) algorithme). In 2019, Tirkolaee et al [46] treated PCARP with demand uncertainty.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robust optimization approach has been studied by many researchers as an effective method to overcome the real‐world instability . This technique can efficiently control the uncertainty level and yield feasible solutions with a high probability …”
Section: Problem Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robust optimization approach has been studied by many researchers as an effective method to overcome the real-world instability. [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] This technique can efficiently control the uncertainty level and yield feasible solutions with a high probability. 45 For a brief description, the robust optimization approach suggested by Bertsimas and Sim 45 is presented as follows.…”
Section: Robust Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%