2021
DOI: 10.1007/s41064-021-00155-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Robust and Efficient Method for Power Lines Extraction from Mobile LiDAR Point Clouds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the maximum length between two adjacent poles in the United States is typically about 90 m (Wydra et al, 2018), the authors used a section length ( L ) equal to 90 m (Figure 3c). For more information on the sectioning process, the readers are referred to Shokri, Rastiveis, Sarasua, et al (2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because the maximum length between two adjacent poles in the United States is typically about 90 m (Wydra et al, 2018), the authors used a section length ( L ) equal to 90 m (Figure 3c). For more information on the sectioning process, the readers are referred to Shokri, Rastiveis, Sarasua, et al (2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing proposed methods for power line extraction from a mobile terrestrial laser scanning (MTLS) point cloud provide mixed results and are time consuming to implement. Some of these methods are based on Hough transform (HT) or random sample consensus (RANSAC) algorithms that perform well in ideal conditions but are sensitive to less‐than‐ideal conditions (Guan et al, 2016; Lehtomäki et al, 2019; Shokri, Rastiveis, Sarasua, et al, 2021; Yadav & Chousalkar, 2017). For example, challenging scenarios like power line cables partially occluded by tree branches and other objects, abrupt changes in the direction of power lines, and complex geometric characteristics of power line components make it clear that more research is needed in automated power line extraction to improve processing time and accuracy (Husain & Vaishya, 2018; Wang et al, 2019; Xu & Wang, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Close-up photogrammetry and terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) are frequently preferred techniques for creating 3D models of small to large objects, buildings, and historical and cultural artifacts [2][3][4]. TLS has been a popular measurement technique in recent years for documenting objects, figures, historical buildings, and cultural heritages [5][6][7]. Point data produced by high-resolution laser scanning offers various solutions in cases where conventional techniques are impractical or impossible to apply [6,[8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TLS has been a popular measurement technique in recent years for documenting objects, figures, historical buildings, and cultural heritages [5][6][7]. Point data produced by high-resolution laser scanning offers various solutions in cases where conventional techniques are impractical or impossible to apply [6,[8][9][10]. Unmanned Aerial Systems (UASs) are cost-effective systems capable of low-altitude flight, which can be operated remotely due to their pilotless use [10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting point cloud data contain highly accurate three-dimensional (3D) locations of topographic features of the roadway and nearby surrounding areas ( 15 ). Since manual processing of these data is labor intensive and time consuming, researchers are continuously working on developing automated methods to extract desirable objects or information such as trees ( 16 , 17 ), pole-shape objects ( 18 ), traffic signs ( 19 ), lane markings ( 12 , 20 ), and multiple objects ( 21 ) from these data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%