2009
DOI: 10.1109/lsp.2009.2028107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Robust Algorithm for Joint-Sparse Recovery

Abstract: We address the problem of finding a set of sparse signals that have nonzero coefficients in the same locations from a set of their compressed measurements. A mixed 2 0 norm optimization approach is considered. A cost function appropriate to the joint-sparse problem is developed, and an algorithm is derived. Compared to other convex relaxation based techniques, the results obtained by the proposed method show a clear improvement in both noiseless and noisy environments.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When all measurement vectors and measurement matrices are centrally available at a FC, many centralized algorithms [4,5,7] can be used to solve the joint-sparse recovery problem at the FC. However, these centralized algorithms are not suitable for distributed networks where each sensor has limited computational and communication resources.…”
Section: Signal Model and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When all measurement vectors and measurement matrices are centrally available at a FC, many centralized algorithms [4,5,7] can be used to solve the joint-sparse recovery problem at the FC. However, these centralized algorithms are not suitable for distributed networks where each sensor has limited computational and communication resources.…”
Section: Signal Model and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literatures of joint-sparse recovery [3,4,5] reveal that exploiting such structure can effectively improve the recovery performance, compared with traditional compressed sensing (CS) [6] with signal measurement vector (SMV). However, most of the existing works focus on centralized scenario where all measurement vectors are centrally available at a central fusion center (FC) and many algorithms have been developed to solve this centralized jointsparse recovery problem, such as mix-norm minimization algorithm [4,5], ReMBo algorithm [7], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MMV problems derive from many applications areas, such as magnetoencephalography, which is a modality for imaging the brain [13]. Similar conceptions were also developed in the context of array processing [14,15] equalization of sparse communication channels [16,17], and more recently line spectrum denoising [18] and cognitive radio communications [19]. In this paper, we want to incorporate this fast growing field into SAR imaging applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Other algorithms, including FOCal Underdetermined System Solver (FOCUSS) [5] and Joint 2,0 Approximation Algorithm (JLZA) [9], are also put forward. When Y and Φ are unperturbed, the recovery process of OMPMMV can be written as:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%