2013
DOI: 10.1109/jsac.2013.sup.0513040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Roadside Scattering Model for the Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication Channel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
50
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the second subcategory, scatterers are realistically (and randomly) located at the roadsides and between the road lanes in which the vehicles move [20]- [22]. The main propagation mechanisms that are realistically modelled are line-of-sight (LOS), discrete multipath components from mobile scatterers, discrete components from static scatterers and diffuse components [20], [21].…”
Section: B Geometry-based Stochastic Channel Models (Gscm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second subcategory, scatterers are realistically (and randomly) located at the roadsides and between the road lanes in which the vehicles move [20]- [22]. The main propagation mechanisms that are realistically modelled are line-of-sight (LOS), discrete multipath components from mobile scatterers, discrete components from static scatterers and diffuse components [20], [21].…”
Section: B Geometry-based Stochastic Channel Models (Gscm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these models, the GBSMs are most widely used in V2V communication systems for theoretical analysis of channel statistics and performance evaluation, which can be classified as regular-shaped GBSMs (RS-GBSMs) [5][6][7][8][9][10] and irregular-shape GBSMs [11,12], mainly depending on whether scatterers are located on regular shapes or irregular shapes. The authors of [5][6][7][8] presented RS-GBSMs consisting two-ring, two-cylinder, and one ellipse models. However, their underlying assumption of all scatterers is being uniformly distributed on regular geometries, which does not agree with the realistic measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drawback compared to RS-GBSMs is that closed-form expressions generally cannot be derived, but there are a number of important benefits: the environment can be easily changed and easily reproduce realistic temporal channel variations [12]. In [6,7], the authors proposed two-dimensional (2D) RS-GBSMs; they neglect signal variations and spatial diversity in the vertical plane. Therefore, 3D two-cylinder and multiring RSGBSMs were developed for wideband nonisotropic MIMO V2V channels in [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is natural to ponder the possibility that measurement campaigns at different sites representing the crossing, suburban, highway, and rural environments are the most direct strategy [5]. However, VANET research relies heavily on simulations, due to the prohibitive costs of deploying realworld testbeds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%