2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2023.108526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A road map for developing novel decision support system (DSS) for disseminating integrated pest management (IPM) technologies

Franck B.N. Tonle,
Saliou Niassy,
Milliam M.Z. Ndadji
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the top-down approach to IPM-DSS typology development, the purpose, objectives, and end users of DSSs were considered, as well as the spatial and temporal constraints on their use. To avoid biases in the structure of the typology (e.g., individual preferences and characteristics from IPM DSS developers favouring their DSS), this step was based on our own experience and the extensive review of available literature on the development of agroecological DSSs [14,17,19,25,27,29,30,38,48,50,[53][54][55][56][57]. In addition, the literature review also indirectly represented the users of IPM DSSs, as the characteristics and features that users want and need are described [19,27,29,30,58,59].…”
Section: (I) Top-down Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the top-down approach to IPM-DSS typology development, the purpose, objectives, and end users of DSSs were considered, as well as the spatial and temporal constraints on their use. To avoid biases in the structure of the typology (e.g., individual preferences and characteristics from IPM DSS developers favouring their DSS), this step was based on our own experience and the extensive review of available literature on the development of agroecological DSSs [14,17,19,25,27,29,30,38,48,50,[53][54][55][56][57]. In addition, the literature review also indirectly represented the users of IPM DSSs, as the characteristics and features that users want and need are described [19,27,29,30,58,59].…”
Section: (I) Top-down Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taechatanasat and Armstrong [37] reviewed DSSs in terms of data requirements. Extensive reviews of IPM DSSs were made by Damos [20] and Tonle et al [38], each describing more than 20 DSSs, but the set of DSS features described in both reviews is rather limited due to the different aims of the reviews. The EuroBlight website [39] contains a similar brief description of some DSSs available in Europe for the control of late blight (Phytophthora infestans) and early blight (Alternaria solani) in potatoes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%