2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A river channel terrain reconstruction method for flood simulations based on coarse DEMs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventionally, hydrodynamic models have been employed for applications such as flood inundation simulations, the assessment of mitigation, and adaptation measures (Wolfs and Willems, 2013;Wang et al, 2021;Li et al, 2019). Despite the fact that the physically based models can simulate the drainage and surface flooding processes well, they usually require a large number of inputs to describe the model structure and parameters and are often computationally intensive, especially with the adoption of two-dimensional calculations (Yin et al, 2020;Jamali et al, 2018;Ziliani et al, 2019;Hou et al, 2021b). Meanwhile, there is an inevitable need for conceptualization and simplification in the physical model, and the relevant calibration and validation procedures are also quite challenging (Davidsen et al, 2017;Coulthard et al, 2013;Wu et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventionally, hydrodynamic models have been employed for applications such as flood inundation simulations, the assessment of mitigation, and adaptation measures (Wolfs and Willems, 2013;Wang et al, 2021;Li et al, 2019). Despite the fact that the physically based models can simulate the drainage and surface flooding processes well, they usually require a large number of inputs to describe the model structure and parameters and are often computationally intensive, especially with the adoption of two-dimensional calculations (Yin et al, 2020;Jamali et al, 2018;Ziliani et al, 2019;Hou et al, 2021b). Meanwhile, there is an inevitable need for conceptualization and simplification in the physical model, and the relevant calibration and validation procedures are also quite challenging (Davidsen et al, 2017;Coulthard et al, 2013;Wu et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the hydrodynamic models, based on the numerical solutions to the 2-D shallow water equations, can reliably predict the physical processes of ood and output temporally and spatially varying ows, water depth and velocity, which can be then used to quantify the ood impact in the objective functions (Li et al, 2021;Xia et al, 2019). Some studies have greatly improved the computational e ciency of simulating the ood propagation by coupling a graphics processing unit (GPU) accelerated hydrodynamic model (Hou et al, 2021;Xia & Liang, 2016), but they still cannot meet the requirements of application in EAs. The directly in combination with ood hydrodynamics propagation is still not a common practice in a ood control optimal operation system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventionally, hydrodynamic models have been employed for applications such as flood inundation simulations, assessment of mitigation and adaptation measures (Wolfs and Willems, 2013;Wang et al, 2021;Li et al, 2019). Despite the fact that the physically-based models can well simulate the 30 drainage and surface flooding processes, they require a large number of inputs to describe the model structure and parameters, and are often computational intensive, especially with the two-dimensional calculations (Yin et al, 2020;Jamali et al, 2018;Ziliani et al, 2019;Hou et al, 2021b). Meanwhile, there is an inevitable need for conceptualization and simplification in the physical model, and the relevant calibration and validation procedures are also quite challenging (Davidsen et al, 2017;35 Coulthard et al, 2013;Wu et al, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%