Abstract:The risk score accurately predicted in-hospital death for PCI procedures using future New York data. Its performance in other patient populations needs to be further studied.
“…In many ways our analysis confirms not only the importance but also the ordering of clinical factors that have been repeatedly demonstrated as strong predictors of outcome following AMI [26][27][28]. Not surprisingly, patients with cardiogenic shock were identified as the highest risk group followed by those with congestive heart failure.…”
BACKGROUND: Previous risk scores have shown excellent performance. However, the need for real-time risk score computation makes their implementation in an emergent situation challenging. A more simplified approach can provide practitioners with a practical bedside risk stratification tool.
“…In many ways our analysis confirms not only the importance but also the ordering of clinical factors that have been repeatedly demonstrated as strong predictors of outcome following AMI [26][27][28]. Not surprisingly, patients with cardiogenic shock were identified as the highest risk group followed by those with congestive heart failure.…”
BACKGROUND: Previous risk scores have shown excellent performance. However, the need for real-time risk score computation makes their implementation in an emergent situation challenging. A more simplified approach can provide practitioners with a practical bedside risk stratification tool.
“…Further, there is only a weak relationship with unplanned CABG [38][39][40][41][42][43][44], which is likely due to the many clinical variables that impact outcomes (Table III). In the Northern New England Registry [26] there was no relationship between operator volume and clinical success, MI as a complication, mortality (low or high-risk patients) or in-hospital CABG.…”
Section: Public Reporting Of Pci Volumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four recently published risk prediction models derived from contemporary datasets are detailed in Table IV [43,44,[55][56][57]. Older models are depicted in Table V [52,[58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65].…”
“…The published results from large real-world registries of usual practice indicate that the short-term risks are not negligible. (25,26) Patients and practitioners sometimes view PCI as a "holding" procedure, which delays CABG and there is a defi nite increase in the need for repeat revascularization, often by CABG, in patients initially treated by PCI. There is at least one observational study suggesting disturbingly that prior PCI may increase (double) in-hospital mortality after CABG.…”
Section: The Management Of Patients With Stable Coronary Syndromesmentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.