2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11739-020-02529-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A risk score model to predict in-hospital mortality of patients with end-stage renal disease and acute myocardial infarction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ethnicity and age are known as root variables as they have no parents. A few studies among the Japanese population state that renal disease and Killip class appear to be related, where acute renal diseases are associated with older age and Killip class II and higher 30–32. This trend is similarly observed in Malaysian STEMI male patients in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Ethnicity and age are known as root variables as they have no parents. A few studies among the Japanese population state that renal disease and Killip class appear to be related, where acute renal diseases are associated with older age and Killip class II and higher 30–32. This trend is similarly observed in Malaysian STEMI male patients in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Indeed, the addition of D-dimer has been investigated to some biomarkers such as C-reactive protein (CRP), NT-proBNP and clinical scores, such as the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score has been investigated. Fu et al included D-dimer levels ≥2.4 mg/L FEU in a risk score model together with CRP, left ventricular ejection fraction, age ≥ 65 years old and heart rate [ 32 ]. In ROC curve analysis, this model demonstrated a good power in predicting in-hospital mortality (AUC = 0.895, 95% CI 0.814–0.96; p < 0.001), better than the predictive power of the GRACE risk score alone (AUC = 0.754, 95% CI 0.641–0.868; p < 0.001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Tello-Montoliu 2007 [ 31 ] NSTEMI 358 67.4 35.8 R 6 Death, new ACS, revascularization, and HF Overall D-dimer level: 340 (211–615) ng/mL Admission D-dimer levels did not predict events [HR: 1.26 (0.79–2.02), p = 0.337). AMI Fu 2020 [ 32 ] AMI with ESRD 113 69.2 33.6 R In-hospital Mortality Mortality: 3.2 mg/L Survival: 1.1 mg/L p = 0.023 D-dimer ≥2.4 mg/L predicted in-hospital mortality (OR 2.771 [95% CI, 1.017–8.947], p < 0.001). Wang 2020 [ 33 ] AMI 197 Male 61.8 Female 74.2 20 P 6 All-cause mortality (in- and out-of-hospital deaths) or readmission.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ROC curve analyses were performed, and the AUC of plasma Phe and PAGln levels in predicting ISR was 0.732 (95% CI, 0.606–0.858; P = 0.002) ( Figure 3 ) and 0.861 (95% CI, 0.766–0.957; P < 0.001) ( Figure 4 ), respectively. The maximum value of the Youden index was a criterion for best cutoff value selection ( 23 ), and the best cutoff values of Phe and PAGln for predicting ISR were 1,370.48 μg/mL (sensitivity: 75%, specificity: 66.7%) and 423.63 ng/mL (sensitivity: 96.4%, specificity: 72.7%), respectively. Both Phe and PAGln had good discriminatory power in predicting ISR, and after the Z-test, the predictive value of PAGln was significantly better ( P = 0.031) ( Figure 5 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%