1993
DOI: 10.1227/00006123-199307000-00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Risk/Benefit Analysis of Spinal Manipulation Therapy for Relief of Lumbar or Cervical Pain

Abstract: Approximately 12 million Americans undergo spinal manipulation therapy (SMT) every year. Renewed interest in this method requires an analysis of its reported risks and possible benefits. This review describes two patients with spinal cord injuries associated with SMT and establishes the risk/benefit ratios for patients with lumbar or cervical pain. The first case is a man who underwent SMT for recurrent sciatica 4 years after chemonucleolysis. During therapy, he developed bilateral sciatica with urinary hesita… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
7

Year Published

1995
1995
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
18
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Powell et al, 31 after reviewing the literature, feel the risk/ benefit ratio in patients with acute midline lumbar pain is Hadler et al 43 Refer to Appendix 2 for definitions of the letters A to Q. * Studies whose primary purpose was to look at adverse reactions of spinal manipulation.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Powell et al, 31 after reviewing the literature, feel the risk/ benefit ratio in patients with acute midline lumbar pain is Hadler et al 43 Refer to Appendix 2 for definitions of the letters A to Q. * Studies whose primary purpose was to look at adverse reactions of spinal manipulation.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Powell et al 31 suggest the presence of a herniated nucleus pulposus as a risk factor to spinal manipulation; however, these authors seem to base their opinion on 2 cases presented and some cases of disk herniation following manipulation reviewed from the literature, without regard for the total number of spinal manipulations performed.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, there has been increased interest over the past three decades to elucidate the possible damaging effects of SMT forces on internal tissues (Cote et al, 1994;Haldeman et al, 2001;Haldeman and Rubinstein, 1992a,b;Ianuzzi and Khalsa, 2005;Paciaroni and Bogousslavsky, 2009;Powell et al, 1993;Rubinstein, 2008;Rubinstein and Haldeman, 2001;Terrett and Kleynhans, 1980). One of the major issues of the use of SMT is its safety, especially with regards to neck manipulation and the risk of stroke (Lee et al, 1995;Paciaroni and Bogousslavsky, 2009;Rubinstein, 2008;Wuest et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Risk factors for complications of SMT may include failure to recognize signs or symptoms of neurologic involvement, coagulation disorders, and manipulation of the cervical spine. 18 Normally, benign and even trivial physical movements or stimuli may be sufficient to trigger the development of SEH in susceptible individuals. Interestingly, SEH precipitated by coughing has been reported in anticoagulated patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%