2023
DOI: 10.17531/ein.2023.1.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A risk assessment method of aircraft structure damage maintenance interval Indexed by: considering fatigue crack growth and detection rate

Abstract: The accurate assessment of aircraft structure damage risk is the premise of establishing reasonable, economic and reliable maintenance intervals. While many studies have proposed damage risk assessment methods for aircraft structures, these methods lack the quantification of risk. This paper proposed a risk assessment method of aircraft structure damage maintenance interval considering fatigue crack growth rate and crack detection rate. The damage process of aircraft structure was simulated by Monte Carlo simu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) Inspection and Maintenance Schedules: In these highly systematic and standardized procedures, technicians conduct meticulous physical examinations of aircraft structures at predetermined intervals [36,37]. The purpose of these checks is to identify any observable signs of structural degradation, such as corrosion, distortion, cracks, or even loose parts [38]. Given the fundamental nature of these inspections, they constitute the primary line of defense against possible structural failure, ensuring the aircraft's physical condition is maintained at its optimal state.…”
Section: Overview Of Traditional Sphm Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Inspection and Maintenance Schedules: In these highly systematic and standardized procedures, technicians conduct meticulous physical examinations of aircraft structures at predetermined intervals [36,37]. The purpose of these checks is to identify any observable signs of structural degradation, such as corrosion, distortion, cracks, or even loose parts [38]. Given the fundamental nature of these inspections, they constitute the primary line of defense against possible structural failure, ensuring the aircraft's physical condition is maintained at its optimal state.…”
Section: Overview Of Traditional Sphm Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polymer composites [15] and layered structures that are a combination of metal alloy and fibre/epoxy prepreg are also used in aviation [30]. However, in the case of aircraft structures, it is particularly important to assess fatigue crack growth rate and crack detection rate for risk evaluation [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%