2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2008.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A rigorous approach towards test case generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Published research in the general area of concurrent program testing has covered aspects such as failure injection , static analysis , controlled execution , mutation testing , model checking , model‐based testing , coverage testing , symbolic analysis , reachability testing and test case generation . In this section are discussed only the relevant related research.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Published research in the general area of concurrent program testing has covered aspects such as failure injection , static analysis , controlled execution , mutation testing , model checking , model‐based testing , coverage testing , symbolic analysis , reachability testing and test case generation . In this section are discussed only the relevant related research.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can be classified in several different ways, considering for example static or dynamic approaches and shared‐memory and/or message‐passing paradigms and also considering the language and/or standard used. The published papers are distributed over a number of discrete testing topics, such as failure injection , formal verification , static analysis , testing‐driven development , controlled execution , mutation testing , model checking , model‐based testing , structural testing , symbolic analysis , search‐based testing , interleaving coverage testing , probabilistic concurrency testing , reachability testing , and test case generation .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference is that their method is used for the interfaces of function calls, reference to a value returned from a function, and reference to global variables shared by two or more functions, while ours is used for the interface of message passing. To obtain test suite, we developed a method called Condition Calculation in [3].…”
Section: Port Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%