2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00039-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A rigid body model of the forearm

Abstract: In this article the forearm, with its complex, continuous motion of masses during pronation/supination, was approximated by a rigid body model consisting of a radial segment rotating around an ulnar segment. The method used to obtain the model parameters is based on three-dimensional voxel data that include velocity information. We propose a criterion that allows the voxels to be attributed to either of the two segments. It is based on the notion that the rotational kinetic energy determined from the voxel dat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Inertial properties were defined for the hand, radius, ulna, and humerus based on previously published descriptions for these segments (McConville et al 1980, Reich & Daunicht 2000). The masses of the clavicle and scapula were each obtained from (Blana et al 2008), as derived from (Clauser et al 1969).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inertial properties were defined for the hand, radius, ulna, and humerus based on previously published descriptions for these segments (McConville et al 1980, Reich & Daunicht 2000). The masses of the clavicle and scapula were each obtained from (Blana et al 2008), as derived from (Clauser et al 1969).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reich and Daunicht have produced a procedure that is very exciting and has strong implications for future biomechanical studies. 19 Examining the mathematically challenging rotation of the forearm about the pronation-supination axis, they have created a method that can separate the radial and ulnar portions of the forearm to determine how the inertial properties change with rotation. While this may not sound very exciting, it may provide a method for improved modeling of the inertial properties of the arm as they change, reflecting changes in muscle bulk location and shape with rotation.…”
Section: Specific Uses In the Forearmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these simple models do not provide a realistic representation of the human anatomy. Focusing on the models that realistically represent the body anatomy, two groups can be distinguished: the partial models [Gilchrist and Winter 1996, Maurel and Thalmann 1999, Pandy and Berme 1988a, Shelburne and Pandy 1997, Tumer and Engin 1993 and the whole-body models [Hatze 1984, Laananen et al 1983, Pandy and Berme 1988c, Reich et al 1999, Silva and Ambrósio 2002b]. The former describe anatomical joints with precise geometry and consider their physiological function.…”
Section: Biomechanical Models For Gait Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multibody dynamics techniques are used in these studies to analyse macroscopic motions, their interactions with the environment and kinematic relations among the elements [Amirouche et al 1990, Anderson and Pandy 2001b, Hatze 1984, Morecki et al 1984, Rasmussen et al 2002, Reich et al 1999, Silva and Ambrósio 2002a, Wismans 1996]. Some studies take advantage of the two levels and use a combination of both to obtain a more detailed analysis, although the computational cost of simulation is obviously increased [Eberhard et al 1999, Maurel and Thalmann 1999, Piazza and Delp 2001, Ribeiro et al 2012].…”
Section: Biomechanical Models For Gait Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%