2001
DOI: 10.1002/1521-186x(2001)22:5+<::aid-bem1023>3.0.co;2-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A richer conceptualization of ?exposure? for epidemiological studies of the ?EMF mixture?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most innovative proposal was to calculate the area under the curve of each of the 31 recordings. The underlying idea was to take into account the intensity of exposure and the time spent at these exposure levels [Neutra and Del Pizzo, 2001]. We also calculated the moving average for 1 h periods to smooth the data and thus attenuate the influence of the extreme values.…”
Section: Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most innovative proposal was to calculate the area under the curve of each of the 31 recordings. The underlying idea was to take into account the intensity of exposure and the time spent at these exposure levels [Neutra and Del Pizzo, 2001]. We also calculated the moving average for 1 h periods to smooth the data and thus attenuate the influence of the extreme values.…”
Section: Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RCM expresses the variability of exposure, while the RCMS reflects its temporal stability. Both are calculated from measurements taken every 15 or 30 s. Despite the absence of knowledge about the possible pathophysiologic and biological mechanisms of magnetic field exposure, numerous research teams are studying its measure with the goal of defining one or several metrics that would better estimate exposure [Sahl et al, 1994;Zhang et al, 1997;Villeuneuve et al, 1998;Ahlbom et al, 2001;Kaune et al, 2001;Neutra and Del Pizzo, 2001;WHO/IARC, 2002].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exposure assessment of studies on the health effects of extremely low-frequency (ELF) magnetic fields (MFs) is further complicated by the fact that it is not known as to which exposure metric is the most pertinent for the possible biological effects (Neutra and Delpizzo, 2001). Time-average MF (or alternatively, the product of MF strength and time) has been used in most epidemiological studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%