2014
DOI: 10.1080/02773945.2014.888465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Rhetoric of Inclusion and the Expansion of Movement Constituencies: Harriot Stanton Blatch and the Classed Politics of Woman Suffrage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Brouwer (2005) explains that “counterpublics emerge when social actors perceive themselves to be excluded from or marginalized within mainstream or dominant publics and communicate about that marginality or exclusion.” (p. 197) Counterpublics engage in internal and external communication because participants “need to speak among themselves in moments of retreat, regrouping, reflection, or rejuvenation, in preparation for or anticipation of engagements with other publics” (Brouwer, 2005, p. 197). Studying counterpublics, scholars have considered how people have sought to overcome exclusions based on race, gender, class, sexuality, ethnicity, and other factors (see, for example, Chávez, 2011; Dolber, 2011; Dunn, 2010; Squires, 2001; Stillion Southard, 2015)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brouwer (2005) explains that “counterpublics emerge when social actors perceive themselves to be excluded from or marginalized within mainstream or dominant publics and communicate about that marginality or exclusion.” (p. 197) Counterpublics engage in internal and external communication because participants “need to speak among themselves in moments of retreat, regrouping, reflection, or rejuvenation, in preparation for or anticipation of engagements with other publics” (Brouwer, 2005, p. 197). Studying counterpublics, scholars have considered how people have sought to overcome exclusions based on race, gender, class, sexuality, ethnicity, and other factors (see, for example, Chávez, 2011; Dolber, 2011; Dunn, 2010; Squires, 2001; Stillion Southard, 2015)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%