2018
DOI: 10.1039/c8nr00995c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A revisit to the structure of Au20(SCH2CH2Ph)16: a cubic nanocrystal-like gold kernel

Abstract: Coinage metal clusters stabilized by organic ligands such as phosphine or organothiolate are well known to possess multi-twinned gold cores, and the face-centered-cubic (fcc) metal atom packing is unstable until the cluster size reaches a certain threshold. In this study, we searched for the smallest size gold nanocrystal protected by thiolate ligands by means of the crystal facet cleavage (CFC) method. Starting from the nanocrystal-like Au28(SR)20 cluster, after cleaving two different crystal facets and patch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mechanism involves two steps: first an exterior Au(0) atom is inserted between a pair of neighboring SR groups in the ligand shell, and then the resulting μ 4 -SR group leaves to form a new Au 3 triangle unit. As shown in Figure , the structural evolution from 8e Au 28 (SR) 20 (R = C 6 H 11 ) to 12e Au 30 (SR) 18 (R = t -Bu) as well as the recently reported Au 20 (SR) 16 isomeric nanocrystal structure all can be explained from this mechanism. Recently, from the ligand exchange reaction of the Ag 3 @Au 15 (SR) 13 cluster, we succeeded in the synthesis and determination of the cluster structure of a Ag@Au 16 (SR) 13 alloy cluster.…”
Section: Structural Evolution Of Fcc-type Clusterssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The mechanism involves two steps: first an exterior Au(0) atom is inserted between a pair of neighboring SR groups in the ligand shell, and then the resulting μ 4 -SR group leaves to form a new Au 3 triangle unit. As shown in Figure , the structural evolution from 8e Au 28 (SR) 20 (R = C 6 H 11 ) to 12e Au 30 (SR) 18 (R = t -Bu) as well as the recently reported Au 20 (SR) 16 isomeric nanocrystal structure all can be explained from this mechanism. Recently, from the ligand exchange reaction of the Ag 3 @Au 15 (SR) 13 cluster, we succeeded in the synthesis and determination of the cluster structure of a Ag@Au 16 (SR) 13 alloy cluster.…”
Section: Structural Evolution Of Fcc-type Clusterssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Since its conception, others have utilized the theory to test the stability of Au NC isomers. 18,19 However, more work is still needed to expand the model's reach, namely the analysis of Au NCs in different size regimes. In addition, using this theory in concert with other developed structure-property relationships on Au NCs could potentially generate a very effective predictive tool bridging the structure with the stability and properties of Au NCs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigation on the structural transformation via ligand exchange is rapidly progressing, as it can unveil the fundamental understanding of the structural transformation at the atomic level. Specific size/structure of the kernel determined by different ligands during the ligand exchange is puzzling due to the dependency on various parameters such as steric, electronic, and aromatic properties of ligands . Even though bulkiness of the ligand plays a vital role in size/structure specificity, we cannot rule out the influence of other parameters such as aromaticity and electronic effects of the ligands, as demonstrated in various stable structures with thiolated benzene and 2-phenylethanethiol. For example, when [Au 144 (PET) 60 ] (PET stands for 2-phenylethanethiol) was transformed to [Au 133 (TBBT) 52 ] (TBBT stands for tert -butylbenzenethiol) via TBBT ligand exchange, aromaticity was considered to cause interligand interaction, while steric repulsion was considered to be triggering the core conversion .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%