2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11230-008-9164-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A revision of the Haploporinae Nicoll, 1914 (Digenea: Haploporidae) from mullets (Mugilidae): two new haploporine genera and a key to the genera of the subfamily

Abstract: Two new haploporine genera are established for parasites of mullets. Ragaia n. g. is erected for R. lizae n. sp. from Liza ramado in the Ebro Delta on the Mediterranean Coast of Spain. This new genus is distinguished by the unique combination of the following characters: a strongly muscular ventral sucker which is twice as large as the oral sucker; a large, muscular hermaphroditic sac similar in length to the ventral sucker; a saccular, thick-walled internal seminal vesicle which is larger than the external se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of digeneans, identification keys were proposed by BlascoCosta et al [11][12][13][14][15]28]. When specimens of Dicrogaster spp.…”
Section: Study Area Fish Sampling and Parasite Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of digeneans, identification keys were proposed by BlascoCosta et al [11][12][13][14][15]28]. When specimens of Dicrogaster spp.…”
Section: Study Area Fish Sampling and Parasite Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Helminth fauna of these fish in the northeast Atlantic and in the Sea of Japan is well known [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Based on an extensive search of the literature and the Host-Parasite Database [19] Kostadinova [20] compiled the checklist of the metazoan parasites of L. haematocheilus throughout its distributional range that comprised 69 nominal species of helminth and ectoparasitic crustacean parasites on that time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings initiated a re-assessment of the status of the nominal species of Dicrogaster by means of a comparative morphological study based on the newly collected material and a critical evaluation of the published data. This also led to the erection of a new haploporine genus to accommodate D. japonica, since its morphological features do not agree with the generic diagnosis of Dicrogaster (see Blasco-Costa et al, 2009). This paper presents the description of a new species of Forticulcita and redescriptions of D. perpusilla and D. contracta, multivariate analyses which discriminate these three Mediterranean forms and keys to the recognised species of both genera.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, the location of some uterine loops in the forebody, in combination with the terminal, funnelshaped oral sucker with sensory papillae around the orifice, bears no resemblance to any of the currently recognised haploporine genera (see Overstreet & Curran, 2005;Blasco-Costa et al, 2009b). In fact, H. musculosaccus departs morphologically from the complex of species described from Valamugil spp.…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…apparently do not fit the historical or current (derived from the features characteristic for the type-species, H. benedeni) generic diagnosis of Haploporus, we conclude that they have been assigned to the wrong genus. However, because of the features listed above, they do not appear to correspond to any recognised haploporine generic diagnosis (see also Overstreet & Curran, 2005;Blasco-Costa et al, 2009b). These species are therefore retained here in the Haploporinae but as incertae sedis with respect to their generic affiliation.…”
Section: Other Nominal Species Of Haploporusmentioning
confidence: 95%