1972
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.1972.tb00847.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A revision of the Celyphidae (Diptera) of the Oriental Region*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have studied pregenital and genital sclerites and muscles in seven specimens of Celyphus (Hemiglobus) porosus Tenorio 1972. Material. 7 males, Northern Vietnam: Phu Tho prov., Thanh Son distr., Xuan Son munic.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We have studied pregenital and genital sclerites and muscles in seven specimens of Celyphus (Hemiglobus) porosus Tenorio 1972. Material. 7 males, Northern Vietnam: Phu Tho prov., Thanh Son distr., Xuan Son munic.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Male genitalia are normally dominated by a pair of long, usually heavily sclerotized median processes which are closely associated with the phallapodeme. These processes were termed gonapophyses (Tenorio 1969), gonites (Tenorio 1972) or gonopods (Papp 1998). We treated them as pregonites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since that time, the family Celyphidae has grown to 115 valid species (of nearly 130 described) within 8 valid genera (of 9 described). Tenorio (1972) is the most comprehensive work on the family, although only dealing with the fauna of the Oriental Region, describing 21 new species-group taxa in addition to redescribing the then-known species in that region. Only 30 additional species have been described in the 45 years since that work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1), and afterwards, Vanschuytbroek (1952) did not mention the species when listing the species known at that time. Tenorio (1972), in her revision of Celyphidae of the Oriental Region, mistakenly referred to the species as having been described from Australia, and offered no further information. However, this was likely a mix-up with a different species, Celyphus inaequalis Costa, 1864, which was described from “Australia ?”, and is, like the current species under study, unknown after its initial description, with the family otherwise not known from the continent of its type locality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%