1964
DOI: 10.5479/si.00963801.115-3493.559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Revision of the Carcharhinid Shark Genera Scoliodon, Loxodon, and Rhizoprionodon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
90
2
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
10
90
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The Lm 50 of males in this study was 59.5 (55-60) cm TL, which is larger than previously reported for this species by Springer (1964) who reported males maturing as small as 38 cm TL. Length at maturity of males were estimated at 29-38 cm TL in India (Appukuttan and Nair, 1988); 43-45 cm TL with Lm 50 at 53 cm in Indonesia (White, 2007), Lm 50 at 53 cm TL in Kuwait (Moore et al, 2012) and 55 cm TL in Bahrain (Moore and Pierce, 2013).…”
Section: Length-weight Relationshipscontrasting
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The Lm 50 of males in this study was 59.5 (55-60) cm TL, which is larger than previously reported for this species by Springer (1964) who reported males maturing as small as 38 cm TL. Length at maturity of males were estimated at 29-38 cm TL in India (Appukuttan and Nair, 1988); 43-45 cm TL with Lm 50 at 53 cm in Indonesia (White, 2007), Lm 50 at 53 cm TL in Kuwait (Moore et al, 2012) and 55 cm TL in Bahrain (Moore and Pierce, 2013).…”
Section: Length-weight Relationshipscontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…In the north-eastern Arabian Sea of Indian EEZ, R. oligolinx is one of the most common sharks having a relatively high economic value for fin and salted meat, caught dominantly by gillnetters operating in the inshore waters. Studies on the distribution and taxonomic account of R. oligolinx are limited (Springer, 1964;Nair et al, 1974;Talwar, 1976;Raje et al, 2007) and studies on biology are rare (Appukuttan and Nair, 1988;White, 2007;Moore et al, 2012) that can support management decisions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is also possible that the observed variation in vertebral counts across G. fowlerae, G. gangeticus and G. siamensis represents population differences in vertebral counts in a single wide-ranging species. A vertebral range of 169-209 is not unrealistic for a carcharhinid shark, as some species are known to have relatively large ranges in vertebral numbers, e.g., Loxodon macrorhinus (148-191 total centra) (24) and Scoliodon macrorhynchos (149-171) (25). Further specimens are required to validate this.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%