2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2017.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A revised study of the Li2+ alkali-dimer using a model potential approach

Abstract: The model potential approach is well adapted to study atomic and molecular systems involving a single active electron. Such is the case of the alkali-dimer lithium cation Li + 2. However, a comparison of the model potential results of Magnier et al.[1] and those based on ab-initio techniques [2, 3, 4] raises a number of questions related to the existence of an important disagreement regarding several excited states,which are found to be repulsive by Magnier et al. [1] but attractive when ab-initio techniques a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting scattering lengths a g and a u of the X 2 + g and A 2 + u states, respectively, are both computed to be positive with a g a u . Our results are consistent with previous studies on the X 2 + g and A 2 + u PECs [27,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. A convergence criterion is developed to bound the range of uncertainty within which the values of the scattering lengths, a g and a u , are constrained.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The resulting scattering lengths a g and a u of the X 2 + g and A 2 + u states, respectively, are both computed to be positive with a g a u . Our results are consistent with previous studies on the X 2 + g and A 2 + u PECs [27,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. A convergence criterion is developed to bound the range of uncertainty within which the values of the scattering lengths, a g and a u , are constrained.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Our result, Eq. (42), might enable similar calculations for Li-Li + , especially given recent advances in calculations of the Li + 2 potential curve [44,49]. We now leave aside the particular case of the Li(2 2 S)-Li + (1 1 S) interactions, and complete the discussion on the evaluation of the three-body terms.…”
Section: A the Additive Dispersion Interaction Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 8)- (10), it is evident that the exchange energies are positive for the 2 2 Σ + u and 1 2 Π g states and negative for the 2 2 Σ + g and 1 2 Π u states, while the exchange splitting for the pair of 2 2 Σ + states is larger by a factor of R/2 compared to the pair of 1 2 Π states, where R is the internuclear distance. Calculations show that the two Σ states and the 1 2 Π u state form potential wells, while the 1 2 Π g state is purely repulsive [51]. It is evident from the data in Eq.…”
Section: F Orientation-dependence Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…( 48) that the net positive long-range potential and positive exchange energy completely account for the repulsive 1 2 Π g state. Of the three states with potential wells, that of the 2 2 Σ + u state exists at the greatest internuclear distance, about 25 a 0 , with a depth of only 127 cm −1 according to a recent model potential calculation [51]. With our long-range expansion of Table II evaluated for ∞ Li as in Eq.…”
Section: F Orientation-dependence Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 89%