2004
DOI: 10.1661/0026-2803(2004)050[0089:arpobn]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A revised palynozonation of British Namurian deposits and comparisons with eastern Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the latter group, the problematical interval of the late Arnsbergian to Alportian is represented only by one biozone ( L. subtriquetra–K. ornatus Zone), which was defined in the Stonehead Beck section (Owens et al ., ). Some of the data permit different interpretations and correlations, because, as in Russia and the Ukraine, many of the foraminifers recorded in those limestones are usually considered as markers for the Bashkirian, but rarely and sparsely, they are also recorded from the uppermost late Serpukhovian.…”
Section: Discussion: Late Serpukhovian/bashkirian Boundary In Northermentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the latter group, the problematical interval of the late Arnsbergian to Alportian is represented only by one biozone ( L. subtriquetra–K. ornatus Zone), which was defined in the Stonehead Beck section (Owens et al ., ). Some of the data permit different interpretations and correlations, because, as in Russia and the Ukraine, many of the foraminifers recorded in those limestones are usually considered as markers for the Bashkirian, but rarely and sparsely, they are also recorded from the uppermost late Serpukhovian.…”
Section: Discussion: Late Serpukhovian/bashkirian Boundary In Northermentioning
confidence: 97%
“…), which might contain, at least in part, this supposed gap. Unfortunately, there is no other fossil group which allows us to calibrate the foraminiferal database in the studied sections, because ammonoids are absent, conodonts have not been studied and palynology data either have insufficient resolution (Owens et al ., ) or suggest younger ages (e.g. Stephenson et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussion: Late Serpukhovian/bashkirian Boundary In Northermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Potonieisporites elegans, based on data from the North Sea, suggest an age no older than Arnsbergian , although Clayton et al (1977) recorded the monosaccate taxon P. elegans in the Pendleian of northern England. However, the top of the range in western Europe is at the top of the Pendleian, whereas in the Silesian Coal Basin it is at the top of the Arnsbergian (Owens et al 2004). However, the top of the range in western Europe is at the top of the Pendleian, whereas in the Silesian Coal Basin it is at the top of the Arnsbergian (Owens et al 2004).…”
Section: Reticulatisporites Carnosus Assemblage Zone (New Zone)mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, the top of the range in western Europe is at the top of the Pendleian, whereas in the Silesian Coal Basin it is at the top of the Arnsbergian (Owens et al 2004). According to Owens et al (2004Owens et al ( , 2005 and McLean et al (2005), the association of Raistrickia nigra, Verrucosisporites morulatus, Grumosisporites verrucosus, Microreticulatisporites concavus, and Reticulatisporites carnosus suggests an age no younger than Arnsbergian for the top of the Reticulatisporites carnosus Assemblage Zone. Thus it would appear that the base of the Reticulatisporites carnosus Zone proposed here is Pendleian to Arnsbergian.…”
Section: Reticulatisporites Carnosus Assemblage Zone (New Zone)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation