2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-015-1115-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Revised Earthquake Catalogue for South Iceland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Parameters of the GRE events are obtained from the earthquake catalogues of the National Observatory of Athens (GRE). Strong-motion recordings for ICE are accessed through the Internet Site for European Strong-motion Data (ISESD, see Data and Resources), and corresponding event parameters are retrieved from the catalogue of Panzera et al (2016).…”
Section: Considered Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameters of the GRE events are obtained from the earthquake catalogues of the National Observatory of Athens (GRE). Strong-motion recordings for ICE are accessed through the Internet Site for European Strong-motion Data (ISESD, see Data and Resources), and corresponding event parameters are retrieved from the catalogue of Panzera et al (2016).…”
Section: Considered Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative approach has been recently proposed by Bayat et al (2022) in which a suite of 3D finite-fault seismic source models for the main seismogenic zones in Southwest Iceland, the transform fault systems of the SISZ and the RPOR, is developed for the purpose of enabling a physics-based PSHA that is free from the shortcomings of an incomplete catalogue. Approaching the problem from a physical standpoint, the models are only constrained by the steady-state velocity of the tectonic extension across the transform zone and the salient geometrical features of the "bookshelf" transcurrent fault system, fully consistent with the fault tectonics and seismicity distribution of the region (Einarsson et al 1981;Einarsson 1991;Stefansson et al 1993;Hreinsdóttir et al 2001a;Einarsson 2008;Stefansson et al 2008;Einarsson 2014;Panzera et al 2016;Steigerwald et al 2018;Einarsson et al 2018). The fault models are thus fully specified in terms of fault locations, dimensions, strike and dip along with the resulting estimates of annual fault slip and moment rates on each fault of the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using EMR method, Pailoplee (2014) calculated the M C, a-value and b-value as 3.8, 4.01 0.54( §0.02) for Thailand region during the period of 1998-2009. Moreover, Panzera et al (2015) followed the maximum curvature method (Wiemer and Wyss 2000) to estimate the M C and b-value while maximum likelihood method is adopted by Utsu (1965) to estimate the b-value. Through their studies, we can conclude that no significant differences have been observed in the adopted methodologies for estimating the M C , avalue and b-value.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%