2005
DOI: 10.3189/172756405781812817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A revised chronology of key Vatnajökull (Iceland) outlet glaciers during the Little Ice Age

Abstract: Glacier fluctuations from key Vatnajökull outlets have been redated using tephrochronology coupled with two lichenometric techniques to ascertain the timing of the Little Ice Age (LIA) maximum in southeast Iceland. An updated tephrochronology for southeast Iceland (both the number of tephra layers present and their geochemical signatures) indicates a LIA maximum for both glaciers between AD 1755 and 1873. Based on a population gradient approach, lichenometrically dated moraines along the margins of Skálafellsj… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, there is good concordance between the spatial pattern of tephra data collected by McKinzey et al (2005) and the spatial pattern of surfaces with similar histories revealed by the U 2 clustering approach. This success suggests that the lichen size distributions present on moraine surfaces that were deposited during specific depositional periods do have a common lichen signature and that the U 2 clustering approach can identify these surfaces.…”
Section: Results and Interpretationsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Overall, there is good concordance between the spatial pattern of tephra data collected by McKinzey et al (2005) and the spatial pattern of surfaces with similar histories revealed by the U 2 clustering approach. This success suggests that the lichen size distributions present on moraine surfaces that were deposited during specific depositional periods do have a common lichen signature and that the U 2 clustering approach can identify these surfaces.…”
Section: Results and Interpretationsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…We use lichen size data previously collected by the first two authors from the complex, fragmented Little Ice Age moraine suites of two adjacent southeastern Icelandic glaciers, Skálafellsjökull and Heinabergsjökull (McKinzey et al 2004). A known history of ice-margin oscillations derived from tephra ages exists for this location, providing an independent means for testing the U 2 clustering results (McKinzey et al 2005).…”
Section: Watson's U 2 Statisticmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The age-size approach adopted by Evans et al (1999), together with their acceptance of historical documentation of an 1887 AD maximum age for the outermost Little Ice Age moraine and associated glacial lake shorelines (Thorarinsson 1939), yields a post 1887 AD recession pattern, during which the proglacial outwash migrated from an unconfined easterly flowing incised fan to a southerly draining, topographically confined and terraced, linear sandur that was channelled between the receding glacier snouts and their long-term outwash heads (Figure 3). The use of the size-frequency method, together with the employment of tephras recovered from the outermost moraines on the foreland, prompted McKinzey et al (2004McKinzey et al ( , 2005 to propose a longer chronology in which the Little Ice Age limit appears to date to either 1850 -1887 AD, Figure 2. Aerial photograph extracts (Landmaelingar Islands) from 1947, 1957, 1969and 1989, showing the extent of glacier ice in each year and the sequential development of the proglacial landforms.…”
Section: Historical Evolution Of Heinabergsjökull and Skalafellsjökullmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temperatures continued to decrease during the Little Ice Age, which reached its maximum in Iceland around 1800 AD (e.g. McKinzey et al 2005; Bradwell et al 2006). Studies of Icelandic outlet glaciers (Thórarinsson 1943; Björnsson 1979) indicate that although their extent fluctuated somewhat, on average glacier volumes did not change significantly between 1750 and 1890.…”
Section: Glacial Isostatic Adjustmentmentioning
confidence: 99%