Abstract:The airways of the lung are the primary sites of disease in asthma and cystic fibrosis. Here we study the cellular composition and hierarchy of the mouse tracheal epithelium by single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) and in vivo lineage tracing. We identify a rare cell type, the Foxi1 pulmonary ionocyte; functional variations in club cells based on their location; a distinct cell type in high turnover squamous epithelial structures that we term 'hillocks'; and disease-relevant subsets of tuft and goblet cells. … Show more
“…In CF, lung disease begins in the small airways where the CFTR protein is primarily expressed [26,27]. In contrast, for treatment of surfactant protein deficiencies, the target cells are located in the parenchyma, mainly in alveolar type 2 (AT-2) cells.…”
Section: A Brief History Of In-vivo Gene Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned before, alternate genetic lung diseases may originate from different cell types and in different regions of the lung [26,27]. This represents a challenge to develop platform gene therapies for multiple diseases, since both the vector tropism and delivery method will have to be fine-tuned to meet specific disease needs.…”
Section: A Brief History Of In-vivo Gene Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CD34 + cells), the same cannot often be said for in-vivo gene therapy for lung or liver. Although there is currently no consensus on the identity of a single ‘lung stem cell’ [26,27], once identified, that stem cell will still require a vector capable of transducing it in an in-vivo setting. The profound differences in developmental and adult lung biology between mice and humans [89] have not made the development of suitable vectors for in-vivo stem cell targeting any easier.…”
Section: Lessons Learned From Ex-vivo Successmentioning
Introduction: Ex-vivo gene therapy has had significant clinical impact over the last couple of years and in-vivo gene therapy products are being approved for clinical use. Gene therapy and gene editing approaches have huge potential to treat genetic disease and chronic illness.
Areas covered: This article provides a review of in-vivo approaches for gene therapy in the lung and liver, exploiting non-viral and viral vectors with varying serotypes and pseudotypes to target-specific cells. Antibody responses inhibiting viral vectors continue to constrain effective repeat administration. Lessons learned from ex-vivo gene therapy and genome editing are also discussed.
Expert opinion: The fields of lung and liver in-vivo gene therapy are thriving and a comparison highlights obstacles and opportunities for both. Overcoming immunological issues associated with repeated administration of viral vectors remains a key challenge. The addition of targeted small molecules in combination with viral vectors may offer one solution. A substantial bottleneck to the widespread adoption of in-vivo gene therapy is how to ensure sufficient capacity for clinical-grade vector production. In the future, the exploitation of gene editing approaches for in-vivo disease treatment may facilitate the resurgence of non-viral gene transfer approaches, which tend to be eclipsed by more efficient viral vectors.
“…In CF, lung disease begins in the small airways where the CFTR protein is primarily expressed [26,27]. In contrast, for treatment of surfactant protein deficiencies, the target cells are located in the parenchyma, mainly in alveolar type 2 (AT-2) cells.…”
Section: A Brief History Of In-vivo Gene Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned before, alternate genetic lung diseases may originate from different cell types and in different regions of the lung [26,27]. This represents a challenge to develop platform gene therapies for multiple diseases, since both the vector tropism and delivery method will have to be fine-tuned to meet specific disease needs.…”
Section: A Brief History Of In-vivo Gene Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CD34 + cells), the same cannot often be said for in-vivo gene therapy for lung or liver. Although there is currently no consensus on the identity of a single ‘lung stem cell’ [26,27], once identified, that stem cell will still require a vector capable of transducing it in an in-vivo setting. The profound differences in developmental and adult lung biology between mice and humans [89] have not made the development of suitable vectors for in-vivo stem cell targeting any easier.…”
Section: Lessons Learned From Ex-vivo Successmentioning
Introduction: Ex-vivo gene therapy has had significant clinical impact over the last couple of years and in-vivo gene therapy products are being approved for clinical use. Gene therapy and gene editing approaches have huge potential to treat genetic disease and chronic illness.
Areas covered: This article provides a review of in-vivo approaches for gene therapy in the lung and liver, exploiting non-viral and viral vectors with varying serotypes and pseudotypes to target-specific cells. Antibody responses inhibiting viral vectors continue to constrain effective repeat administration. Lessons learned from ex-vivo gene therapy and genome editing are also discussed.
Expert opinion: The fields of lung and liver in-vivo gene therapy are thriving and a comparison highlights obstacles and opportunities for both. Overcoming immunological issues associated with repeated administration of viral vectors remains a key challenge. The addition of targeted small molecules in combination with viral vectors may offer one solution. A substantial bottleneck to the widespread adoption of in-vivo gene therapy is how to ensure sufficient capacity for clinical-grade vector production. In the future, the exploitation of gene editing approaches for in-vivo disease treatment may facilitate the resurgence of non-viral gene transfer approaches, which tend to be eclipsed by more efficient viral vectors.
“…However, absence or very low levels of inflammation indicate the presence of innate sensing mechanisms that can either signal "keep calm" or initiate protective responses such as secretion of antimicrobial peptides, a boost in mucociliary clearance (MC) or neurogenic inflammation. 4,[9][10][11] In a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC)-transgenic mouse model expressing eGFP under control of the promoter for the acetylcholine (ACh) synthesizing enzyme choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) and utilizing ChAT-antisera, eG-FP-fluorescent tracheal epithelial cells were identified as BC. In recent years, brush cells (BC), a less abundant epithelial cell type with a characteristic tuft of apical microvilli and elusive function for more than 60 years after their discovery, were identified as specialized chemosensory cells serving as sentinels in various organs including the airway epithelium.…”
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri butio n-NonCo mmercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
AbstractFor protection from inhaled pathogens many strategies have evolved in the airways such as mucociliary clearance and cough. We have previously shown that protective respiratory reflexes to locally released bacterial bitter "taste" substances are most probably initiated by tracheal brush cells (BC). Our single-cell RNA-seq analysis of murine BC revealed high expression levels of cholinergic and bitter taste signaling transcripts (Tas2r108, Gnat3, Trpm5). We directly demonstrate the secretion of acetylcholine (ACh) from BC upon stimulation with the Tas2R agonist denatonium. Inhibition of the taste transduction cascade abolished the increase in [Ca 2+ ] i in | 317 HOLLENHORST ET aL.
“…The power of these reactions has been demonstrated in numerous syntheses of complex natural products 1,2 . However, the scope of cycloadditions is limited to certain combinations of starting materials, which has restricted their use for making libraries of compounds in drugdiscovery programs 3 .…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.