2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jveb.2018.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review: Today's practices about the fitness for travel on land of horses toward the slaughterhouse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After unloading, some horses were showing clinical problems (i.e., laminitis, neurological problems, blindness) which were judged preexisting since these severe and chronic health issues could not have been developed over 24 h, and some of the injuries could therefore have been also preexisting. It is worth highlighting that one-eye blindness is not considered among the unfitness requirements in the present regulations (Regulation EC 1/2005 [ 16 ]), and that requirements for unfitness are not unanimous among codes and regulations [ 20 ]. Overall, considering that the examined journeys were all approved by competent authorities, our findings suggest that the evaluation of the fitness for transport is still an area of concern and that many horses with pre-existing conditions are transported, leading to worse welfare on arrival [ 3 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After unloading, some horses were showing clinical problems (i.e., laminitis, neurological problems, blindness) which were judged preexisting since these severe and chronic health issues could not have been developed over 24 h, and some of the injuries could therefore have been also preexisting. It is worth highlighting that one-eye blindness is not considered among the unfitness requirements in the present regulations (Regulation EC 1/2005 [ 16 ]), and that requirements for unfitness are not unanimous among codes and regulations [ 20 ]. Overall, considering that the examined journeys were all approved by competent authorities, our findings suggest that the evaluation of the fitness for transport is still an area of concern and that many horses with pre-existing conditions are transported, leading to worse welfare on arrival [ 3 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Worldwide, journey conditions are regulated by specific codes, such as “European Regulation 1/2005” [ 16 ], “Australian Animal Welfare Standards and Guidelines” [ 17 ], “Code of practice for the care and handling of Equines” [ 18 ], “Code of welfare: Transport within New Zealand” [ 19 ]. However, the requirements of these different regulations do not always match, and some criteria remain open to interpretation or have been considered inappropriate [ 20 ]. For example, European Council Regulation (EC) 1/2005 sets a minimum space allowance of 1.75 m 2 per horse, even if adult horses may have different sizes and shapes [ 2 , 12 , 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ensuring that horses are fit before transport is highly important for the welfare of the horses during the loading, transit, unloading and post journey stages. In addition, a physically fit horse is more capable of handling stress than an unfit horse (Vermeulen, 2019). Transport associated exacerbation of infectious diseases (either through contact with unfamiliar pathogens and/or immunological impairment due to transport‐associated stressors) is common in horses (Dalin et al., 1993; Stull and Rodiek, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same year, 389,153 horses were slaughtered in South America [2]. However, to this day, the circumstances in which horses are transported give rise to discussion [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%