2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2018.09.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review study: Computational techniques for expecting the impact of non-synonymous single nucleotide variants in human diseases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Converging computational evidence from different bioinformatics tools is considered supporting evidence for either pathogenicity (PP3) or benignity (BP4). Apart from the programs specifically exploring splicing alteration, an abundance of tools has been developed to analyze missense variants, while others are suitable to predict the effect of coding and noncoding variants [ 111 ]. In many cases, tools rely on the evaluation of the evolutionary conservation, protein structure, or function (or a combination thereof).…”
Section: Applying the Acmg Standards And Guidelines For The Interpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Converging computational evidence from different bioinformatics tools is considered supporting evidence for either pathogenicity (PP3) or benignity (BP4). Apart from the programs specifically exploring splicing alteration, an abundance of tools has been developed to analyze missense variants, while others are suitable to predict the effect of coding and noncoding variants [ 111 ]. In many cases, tools rely on the evaluation of the evolutionary conservation, protein structure, or function (or a combination thereof).…”
Section: Applying the Acmg Standards And Guidelines For The Interpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SIFT, PolyPhen2, CADD, SNAP2, FIRM (28)(29)(30)(31)(32)). Many of these tools incorporate long-range evolutionary information from cross-species conservation into the underlying model (33,34). We anticipate that the incorporation of short-term human baseline models such as HA 3 could be beneficial to these efforts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is used to assess the possible functional influence of nonsynonymous (single or multiple nonsynonymous) and in-frame indel (insertions and deletions) variations on a protein. It predicts the variation as deleterious or natural, if the functional impact score is less than or equal to − 2.5 (≤ − 2.5) it is estimated deleterious; score above − 2.5 (> − 2.5) is estimated neutral [77].…”
Section: Predicting the Most Deleterious Missense Nssnpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This server determines whether a certain amino acid substitution is related to disease or neutral by protein sequence information, protein structure, conservation and solvent accessibility. The output is a probability index with a score of 0.0 to 1.0, when the score is higher than 0.5, the substituted amino acid is pathogenic [77,81].…”
Section: Yes [59]mentioning
confidence: 99%