2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.110410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review on UREX processes for nuclear spent fuel reprocessing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4%). 4 As of 2020, approximately 450 000 tons of SNF have been cumulatively generated worldwide, of which only $25% have been reprocessed using the decades-old Plutonium Uranium Redox EXtraction (PUREX) process. 5 While this commercial, liquid-liquid process is extremely efficient at extracting and recycling UO 2 2+ using stoichiometric extractants, in turn reducing SNF loads, PUREX involves the selective extraction of a pure Pu stream which raises signicant proliferation concerns from major stakeholders, such as the U.S. 6 While other reprocessing schemes addressing these concerns have been developed (e.g., UREX), none are commercial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4%). 4 As of 2020, approximately 450 000 tons of SNF have been cumulatively generated worldwide, of which only $25% have been reprocessed using the decades-old Plutonium Uranium Redox EXtraction (PUREX) process. 5 While this commercial, liquid-liquid process is extremely efficient at extracting and recycling UO 2 2+ using stoichiometric extractants, in turn reducing SNF loads, PUREX involves the selective extraction of a pure Pu stream which raises signicant proliferation concerns from major stakeholders, such as the U.S. 6 While other reprocessing schemes addressing these concerns have been developed (e.g., UREX), none are commercial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this day, proliferation concerns have superseded reprocessing efforts in places like the U.S., forcing countries to instead increase their SNF storage capacity, thus deferring action on the nuclear waste issue. 4,6,7 New strategies for the selective separation and recovery of UO 2 2+ from SNF, without the parallel extraction of a Pu stream, could therefore significantly aid in reducing net SNF generated from reactors, minimizing demands on long-term geological repositories, and in turn closing the fuel cycle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, nuclear spent fuel management is one of the major problems in the use of nuclear energy (Waris and Sekimoto, 2001;Warin, 2007;IAEA, 2009). In order to solve this problem, this spent fuels has high radiotoxicity should be converted into stable or short-lived isotopes by nuclear reactions (Fridstrom, 2010;Loberg, 2010;Loberg et al, 2010;Zakova and Wallenius, 2013;Kumari et al, 2020). This situation can be created naturally or artificially, such as through human intervention (Günay, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These reactors use an enriched uranium-based fuel, composed of uranium oxide (UOX). Containing 3–5% of fissile 235 U, this fuel generates fission products and plutonium [ 3 ]. France has long made the choice of reprocessing used fuel, in order to valorize both unburnt uranium and generated plutonium, through the preparation of fuel composed of mixed uranium and plutonium oxides—MOX, Mixed OXide fuel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%