2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.gsd.2023.100914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review on the use of permeable reactive barriers as an effective technique for groundwater remediation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bioremediation agents are mainly applied in two ways: permeable reactive barrier (PRB) [12] and in situ reactive zone (IRZ) [97]. PRB, also called Permeable reactive treatment zone, needs to construct a barrier and apply its reactive media, which is a remediation agent.…”
Section: In Situ Application Of Bioremediation Agentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bioremediation agents are mainly applied in two ways: permeable reactive barrier (PRB) [12] and in situ reactive zone (IRZ) [97]. PRB, also called Permeable reactive treatment zone, needs to construct a barrier and apply its reactive media, which is a remediation agent.…”
Section: In Situ Application Of Bioremediation Agentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indigenous microorganisms or specific degradation bacteria were used in enhanced in situ bioremediation to modify local biological culture. Adding various types of enhanced bioremediation agents with carbon, electron donor, or acceptor-releasing material can provide a suitable environment and nutrients for microbial degradation, accelerating microbial reproduction rate and improving pollutant removal efficiency [10][11][12][13]. Through the keyword co-occurrence visual analysis of the literature on the global groundwater bioremediation survey and research from 2010 to the present (Figure 1), it is found that the in situ bioremediation of groundwater for organic pollution is mainly composed of halogenated hydrocarbon, petroleum hydrocarbons, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These barriers are designed to activate several mechanisms to decontaminate the groundwater plume, e.g., precipitation, sorption, and degradation [162]. Conventional reactive materials have been investigated and implemented for this purpose including zero-valent iron (ZVI), carbonaceous materials, sulfate-reducing bacteria, metal oxide/sulfides, mineral materials, and industrial wastes [159,161,162,[164][165][166]. Innovative materials include the use of single materials, e.g., meso-zero-valent iron, permeable concrete, basic oxygen furnace slag, or modified/composite materials [164,166].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional reactive materials have been investigated and implemented for this purpose including zero-valent iron (ZVI), carbonaceous materials, sulfate-reducing bacteria, metal oxide/sulfides, mineral materials, and industrial wastes [159,161,162,[164][165][166]. Innovative materials include the use of single materials, e.g., meso-zero-valent iron, permeable concrete, basic oxygen furnace slag, or modified/composite materials [164,166]. The factors that affect the selection of materials for permeable reactive barriers include [159]:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pump and treat approach is the conventional solution commonly applied to contaminated sites with aromatic compounds with NAPL sources, preventing the spreading of contaminant plumes (Sakr et al, 2023). However, such treatment techniques have disadvantages such as transferring contaminants from one medium to another, high cost and maintenance requirements, and long duration of operation (Yerushalmi et al, 1999).…”
Section: Monitoring Nitrite Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%