2017
DOI: 10.1155/2017/7171957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review on the Progress of Ion-Engineered Water Flooding

Abstract: In the oil and gas industry, Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) plays a major role to meet the global requirement for energy. Many types of EOR are being applied depending on the formations, fluid types, and the condition of the field. One of the latest and promising EOR techniques is application of ion-engineered water, also known as low salinity or smart water flooding. This EOR technique has been studied by researchers for different types of rocks. The mechanisms behind ion-engineered water flooding have not been … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This injection technique is gaining attention based on the multiple research documented in the literature. LSW is also referred in the literature as Advanced Ion Management, Designer Water Flood, Engineered Water Flooding, LoSal™ and Smart Water Flood, among others (Al-Shalabi & Sepehrnoori, 2016) (Kilybay, Ghosh & Thomas, 2017). For simplicity and integrate different concepts and approaches, in this paper authors will use the term Adjusted Brine Chemistry Waterflooding or ABCW (Alvarado, Garcia-Olvera & Manrique, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This injection technique is gaining attention based on the multiple research documented in the literature. LSW is also referred in the literature as Advanced Ion Management, Designer Water Flood, Engineered Water Flooding, LoSal™ and Smart Water Flood, among others (Al-Shalabi & Sepehrnoori, 2016) (Kilybay, Ghosh & Thomas, 2017). For simplicity and integrate different concepts and approaches, in this paper authors will use the term Adjusted Brine Chemistry Waterflooding or ABCW (Alvarado, Garcia-Olvera & Manrique, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is reported that the carbonate formation surface is positively charged at pH values less than 8–9, , with the reason being the release of Ca 2+ to brine by the dissolution of calcium carbonate while consuming H + . This results in an increase in the pH value, which causes wettability alteration of the carbonate rock and, hence, an increase in oil recovery. On the contrary, Al-Shalabi et al suggested electric double-layer expansion as the main contributor for increasing oil recovery in LSWF . The electric double layer (EDL) is a description of the distribution of ions in the aqueous neighborhood of the reservoir rock.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a surface exposed to brine develops two charged layers around it. The inner layer (the stern layer) is either negatively or positively charged, but it is always strongly attached to the solid, whereas the second layer (the diffuse layer) contains positive and negative ions in motion. During LSWF, the EDL expands as a result of the reduction in the salinity and the related drop in ionic strength. This expansion causes a reduction in the adsorption of oil droplets onto the formation wall and helps to strip oil from the surface, which is equivalent to rendering the rock wettability toward more water-wet (which increases oil recovery). , Rendering the carbonate surface toward water-wet is found to enhance the oil recovery significantly and would be favorable toward carbon geosequestration. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, the single-well chemical tracer test and a few field studies were performed to evaluate the impact of MSW at larger scales. Several studies summarized the influencing parameters on the performance of MSW flooding in carbonates. Parallel to the experimental investigations, analytical and numerical models are also developed for both core and field scales. , Although the underlying reactive transport equations are identical, these studies differ in the way they alter the transport properties of the oleic and aqueous phases because of the change of brine composition and its subsequent interaction with crude oil and rock surfaces. Al-shalabi et al modeled the two core flooding tests conducted by Yousef et al using the UTCHEM simulator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%