2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.03.112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review on the interaction of nucleoside analogues with SARS-CoV-2 RNA dependent RNA polymerase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, regardless of the differences between their binding energies and ours, the fact that the cells have higher mM [ATP] concentrations than [CTP] in vivo, because the former is the major energy currency of the cells, suggests that Lamivudine-TP must be able to compete with CTP for binding to the SARS-CoV-2 RdRp similarly, or possibly better than Remdesivir-TP competing vs. ATP for the same enzyme. In concordance with these conclusions, a recent review on the effect of ANNAs on the SARS-CoV-2 RdRp arrived at the same prediction for Lamivudine (84). Additionally, a recent docking report indicates the putative binding of Lamivudine to the main protease (MPro) of the SARS-CoV-2 (35), therefore it seems possible that, as reviewed here, Lamivudine could inhibit the three key SARS-CoV-2 processes: Spike/ACE2 interaction, processing by MPro and, as found here, RNA replication by the SARS-CoV-2 RdRp polymerase.…”
Section: Other Repurposing or Putative Reusage Of Annas And Lamivudine Against Sars-cov-2 And Covid-19supporting
confidence: 64%
“…Furthermore, regardless of the differences between their binding energies and ours, the fact that the cells have higher mM [ATP] concentrations than [CTP] in vivo, because the former is the major energy currency of the cells, suggests that Lamivudine-TP must be able to compete with CTP for binding to the SARS-CoV-2 RdRp similarly, or possibly better than Remdesivir-TP competing vs. ATP for the same enzyme. In concordance with these conclusions, a recent review on the effect of ANNAs on the SARS-CoV-2 RdRp arrived at the same prediction for Lamivudine (84). Additionally, a recent docking report indicates the putative binding of Lamivudine to the main protease (MPro) of the SARS-CoV-2 (35), therefore it seems possible that, as reviewed here, Lamivudine could inhibit the three key SARS-CoV-2 processes: Spike/ACE2 interaction, processing by MPro and, as found here, RNA replication by the SARS-CoV-2 RdRp polymerase.…”
Section: Other Repurposing or Putative Reusage Of Annas And Lamivudine Against Sars-cov-2 And Covid-19supporting
confidence: 64%
“…The incorporation of FNC blocks subsequent attachment of nucleotides to the 3′-hydroxy group, thus terminating the synthesis of the RNA chain and virus replication (Figure ). Additionally, nucleoside-based antivirals could suppress viral replication by inhibiting DNA- and RNA-dependent polymerases . Consequently, we speculate that clinically used nucleoside-based antivirals may have the potential to be repurposed for COVID-19 treatment.…”
Section: ′-Modified Nucleosides Used In Antiviral Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Additionally, nucleoside-based antivirals could suppress viral replication by inhibiting DNA-and RNAdependent polymerases. 24 Consequently, we speculate that clinically used nucleoside-based antivirals may have the potential to be repurposed for COVID-19 treatment. Encouragingly, in our preliminary randomized, open-label, controlled clinical trial (clinical trial numbers: C h i C T R 2 0 0 0 0 2 9 8 5 3 , C h i C T R 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 4 1 , ChiCTR2000030424, and ChiCTR2000030487), we found that azvudine shortened the mean time (2.60 days) of the first nucleic acid negative conversion (NANC) of mild and common COVID-19 patients, shorter than that (5.60 days) of those receiving standard antiviral treatment (interferon alpha, kaletra and ribavirin, chloroquine phosphate, and hydroxychloroquine sulfate).…”
Section: Azvudine (Fnc)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The increased awareness that started in the 1960s of the therapeutic significance of modified nucleosides in the treatment of viral and bacterial infections quickly led to the syntheses of small molecules that do not destroy viral pathogens but rather inhibit their replication and transcription [28] , [29] . The study of nucleoside analogs as antiviral agents has undergone extraordinary advancements, from the original empirical viral infection inhibition with purine analogs painstakingly synthesized in the laboratory [30] , to in silico methodologies that allow the rapid identification of nucleoside analogs with potential antiviral activity by inhibiting viral replication or transcription [31] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%