The 8th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP 2014) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/eucap.2014.6901713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review on the electromagnetic characterisation of building materials at micro- and millimetre wave frequencies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such approach has been also extended to the electromagnetic parameters of the OUT (relative permittivity-ε R -and electrical conductivity-σ), in order to estimate their values for the OUT never addressed so far (e.g., the monitor or the bookshelf ) or to consolidate their evaluation for the most common objects (like the wall sample and the wooden panel), still not reliably and extensively investigated at mm-waves in the few studies available in the literature ( [25][26][27] for a brick wall).…”
Section: Rt Parameters Tuningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such approach has been also extended to the electromagnetic parameters of the OUT (relative permittivity-ε R -and electrical conductivity-σ), in order to estimate their values for the OUT never addressed so far (e.g., the monitor or the bookshelf ) or to consolidate their evaluation for the most common objects (like the wall sample and the wooden panel), still not reliably and extensively investigated at mm-waves in the few studies available in the literature ( [25][26][27] for a brick wall).…”
Section: Rt Parameters Tuningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we did not carry out a thorough investigation on this point, there seems to be a fixed ratio of about 0.3 between the size of grains and the wavelength at the cutoff frequency. (Abel & Wallace, 2019) 4.11 (18 GHz) (Stavrou & Saunders, 2003) 3.7-4 (9-24 GHz) (Stavrou & Saunders, 2003) 4.11-4.46 (2-40 GHz) (Ferreira et al, 2014) 3.95-4.41 (60 GHz) (Ferreira et al, (Alawneh et al, 2019) 2.05 (100 GHz) (Hirvonen et al, 1996) 2.25 (300 GHz) 2. (Alawneh et al, 2019) 2.061-2.069 (100-300 GHz) (Afsar, 1987) 2.107 (300 GHz) (Kazemipour et al, 2015) 2.06 (300 GHz) (Chang et al, 2017) 2 (50-500 GHz) (Kazemipour et al, 2015) Paraffin 2.03 (10 GHz) 2.2-2.4 (10 GHz) (Von Hippel, 1966) 2.19 (300 GHz) 2.248-2.283 (300GHz-1THz) (Ghassemiparvin & Ghalichechian, 2016) Sandstone 7.7 (10 GHz) 6.53 (30 GHz) 5.37-5.64 (1.1-1.7 GHz) (Vaccaneo et al, 2004) Pine wood 2.10 (10 GHz) 2 (10 GHz) (Zhekov et al, 2020) 10.1029/2020RS007164…”
Section: Applicabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electromagnetic characteristics of some common indoor office materials were determined as a result of material measurements in high frequencies. [32][33][34][35][36] Moreover, even humidity and temperature of the environment are able to influence the propagation paths and received power. Therefore, in the simulation, the permittivity of the materials was chosen…”
Section: Dielectric Properties Of Indoor Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%