2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review on the accuracy of teacher judgments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
79
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 182 publications
5
79
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This meta-analytic message suggests that teachers’ perceptions of child temperament could affect their pedagogical decisions, which was consistent with other reports. For instance, it was found [ 156 ] that teachers tended to overestimate the achievement level of their class and were barely accurate in the assessment of negative emotions of the students. Deater-Deckard et al [ 42 ] provided evidence that perceived polarities of pupils’ temperament were related to the mismatch between the assigned grades and children’s abilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This meta-analytic message suggests that teachers’ perceptions of child temperament could affect their pedagogical decisions, which was consistent with other reports. For instance, it was found [ 156 ] that teachers tended to overestimate the achievement level of their class and were barely accurate in the assessment of negative emotions of the students. Deater-Deckard et al [ 42 ] provided evidence that perceived polarities of pupils’ temperament were related to the mismatch between the assigned grades and children’s abilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent reviews and meta-analyses on teachers' judgment accuracy have stressed the urgent need for intervention studies on improving the quality of teachers' judgment (Kaufmann, 2020;Urhahne & Wijnia, 2021). Facilitating diagnostic competencies is a relatively new field with only nine empirical studies, none of which contain concrete interventions or suggesting methods to foster the quality of teachers' judgments on students' written performances (Chernikova et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that teacher judgements do not perfectly resemble student performance, and more than 40% of the variance may be attributed to teachers' reliance on nonacademic information. A more recent review study concludes that the accuracy of teacher judgements tends to be quite high with respect to students' academic achievement and intelligence, yet is substantially lower for outcomes that can indirectly contribute to students' educational success, such as judgements about student creativity, memory, meta-cognition, social skills and learning motivation (Urhahne & Wijnia, 2020). This can have important implications for biases in track recommendations, as teachers often base their recommendations on more than academic achievement and intelligence alone (Boone & Van Houtte, 2013;Vanlommel & Schildkamp, 2018).…”
Section: Inaccuracy Of Teachers' Judgementsmentioning
confidence: 99%