2010
DOI: 10.1155/2010/381465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review on Spectrum Sensing for Cognitive Radio: Challenges and Solutions

Abstract: Cognitive radio is widely expected to be the next Big Bang in wireless communications. Spectrum sensing, that is, detecting the presence of the primary users in a licensed spectrum, is a fundamental problem for cognitive radio. As a result, spectrum sensing has reborn as a very active research area in recent years despite its long history. In this paper, spectrum sensing techniques from the optimal likelihood ratio test to energy detection, matched filtering detection, cyclostationary detection, eigenvalue-bas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
388
1
10

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 585 publications
(401 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
2
388
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, sensing techniques based on the eigenvalues of the received sample covariance matrix (see, for instance, [4]- [10]) recently emerged as a promising solution, as they do not require a priori assumptions on the signal to be detected, and typically outperform the popular energy detection method when multiple sensors are available. Eigenvaluebased detection (EBD) schemes can be further divided into two categories: methods that assume knowledge of noise level (referred to as "semi-blind" [4]), and methods that do not assume this knowledge ("blind"). Methods belonging to the first class provide better performance when the noise variance is known exactly, whereas blind methods are more robust to uncertain or varying noise level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, sensing techniques based on the eigenvalues of the received sample covariance matrix (see, for instance, [4]- [10]) recently emerged as a promising solution, as they do not require a priori assumptions on the signal to be detected, and typically outperform the popular energy detection method when multiple sensors are available. Eigenvaluebased detection (EBD) schemes can be further divided into two categories: methods that assume knowledge of noise level (referred to as "semi-blind" [4]), and methods that do not assume this knowledge ("blind"). Methods belonging to the first class provide better performance when the noise variance is known exactly, whereas blind methods are more robust to uncertain or varying noise level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, energy detection has been widely used since it does not require any a priori knowledge of the primary signals and has much lower complexity than the other two schemes. In addition, it does not need any prior information about the PUs' signals [5].…”
Section: IImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different methods such as matched filter [7,8], energy detection [9,10], cyclostationary detection [11][12][13][14], eigenvalue detection [15][16][17], and covariance-based detection [18] are proposed for spectrum sensing in the literature. These methods have their own advantages and disadvantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%