A Review on Routing Information Protocol (RIP) and Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) Routing Protocol

Verma, Abhishek; Bhardwaj, Neha

doi:10.14257/ijfgcn.2016.9.4.13

Cited by 29 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Basically the sequence number is used even number for the active network and odd number for inactivate network. When the routing information circulated among inactive node, at that time occurs more sending troubles [22].…”

Section: Destination Sequenced Distance Vector Routing Protocol (Dsdv)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Survey of wormhole attack in wireless sensor networks

Ghugar

Pradhan

2021

Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

From the last decade, a wireless sensor network (WSN) has a very important role over the networks. The primary features of WSN include satellite communication, broadcast channel, hostile environment, medical system and data gathering. There are a lot of attacks available in WSN.In wormhole attack scenario is brutal from other attacks, which is smoothly resolved in networks but tough to observe. This survey paper is an experiment to observing threats and also focuses on some different method to identify the wormhole attacks.

show abstract

Section: Destination Sequenced Distance Vector Routing Protocol (Dsdv)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Survey of wormhole attack in wireless sensor networks

Ghugar

Pradhan

2021

Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Furthermore, this area includes assessing routing protocols implemented in these networking devices, the update version employed, configuration enabled, and the phase-out of legacy protocols such as RIPv1 and IGRP. Although applications of advanced techniques in dynamic routing protocols such as Route Poisoning, Split Horizon, and Holddown have the capability to increase security, they can be a risk factor when improperly configured on these networking devices and their respective IP routing tables [78].…”

Section: Network Misconfigurationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cyber Third-Party Risk Management: A Comparison of Non-Intrusive Risk Scoring Reports

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cybersecurity is a concern for organizations in this era. However, strengthening the security of an organization’s internal network may not be sufficient since modern organizations depend on third parties, and these dependencies may open new attack paths to cybercriminals. Cyber Third-Party Risk Management (C-TPRM) is a relatively new concept in the business world. All vendors or partners possess a potential security vulnerability and threat. Even if an organization has the best cybersecurity practice, its data, customers, and reputation may be at risk because of a third party. Organizations seek effective and efficient methods to assess their partners’ cybersecurity risks. In addition to intrusive methods to assess an organization’s cybersecurity risks, such as penetration testing, non-intrusive methods are emerging to conduct C-TPRM more easily by synthesizing the publicly available information without requiring any involvement of the subject organization. In this study, the existing methods for C-TPRM built by different companies are presented and compared to discover the commonly used indicators and criteria for the assessments. Additionally, the results of different methods assessing the cybersecurity risks of a specific organization were compared to examine reliability and consistency. The results showed that even if there is a similarity among the results, the provided security scores do not entirely converge.

show abstract

“…The path is chosen by calculating distance and vector direction of next router based on the information provided by the neighboring routers. If a change occurs in topology of network the path is updated by router [2]. The property of convergence and efficiency of protocol makes it different from IGRP.…”

Section: Extended Interior Gateway Protocol (Eigrp)mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comparative Study of Routing Protocols Including RIP, OSPF and BGP

Nasir

Tariq

2018

Research Journal Of Computer Science And Information Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In network communication, routing is the process of transferring data across network between different end devices. Communication can be within a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN). Despite of the network type, routing is considered as an important process in network communication. Router works with routing protocols. Routing protocol basically determines the way in which different routers communicate and transfer data. Different protocols have different attributes, algorithms and architecture that makes them capable to achieve reliable communication. So, we can say that the basics for transferring data across network is routing protocols. The data moves across different network topologies and different protocols working within and outside an autonomous system handles this data. Various protocols used in routing includes: Routing Information Protocol (RIP), Open Shortest Path First (OSPF), Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) and many more. The purpose of this paper is to provide a comparison of different routing protocols. The main focus of this paper will be on OSPF, RIP, BGP and its types.

show abstract

A Review on Routing Information Protocol (RIP) and Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) Routing Protocol

Abstract: The routing protocol transport the best connection, creating during message in the network. The router can work with the help of routing protocols.

Cited by 29 publications

References 2 publications

Survey of wormhole attack in wireless sensor networks

Survey of wormhole attack in wireless sensor networks

Cyber Third-Party Risk Management: A Comparison of Non-Intrusive Risk Scoring Reports

A Comparative Study of Routing Protocols Including RIP, OSPF and BGP

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About