2020
DOI: 10.1080/01932691.2020.1773847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review on modeling, simulation and experiment of electrokinetic micromixers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These techniques make use of different forces and phenomena to control flow and promote effective interaction between fluids. Some of the prominent micromixing techniques include pressure gradients [31][32][33], capillary effects (thermocapillary and electrocapillary) [33,34], electrokinetics [35,36], magnetohydrodynamics (magnetic field, Lorentz forces) [37,38], rotations, centrifugal forces, and acoustic streaming [39,40].…”
Section: Mixing At the Microscalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques make use of different forces and phenomena to control flow and promote effective interaction between fluids. Some of the prominent micromixing techniques include pressure gradients [31][32][33], capillary effects (thermocapillary and electrocapillary) [33,34], electrokinetics [35,36], magnetohydrodynamics (magnetic field, Lorentz forces) [37,38], rotations, centrifugal forces, and acoustic streaming [39,40].…”
Section: Mixing At the Microscalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the mixing applications consider one fluidic sample having a certain uncharged biological or chemical species and another fluidic sample of a reagent having a deficiency of that species. According to this, we consider the concentration of C=Cin$C={C}_{\textit{in}}$ for F 1 fluidic stream and C=0$C=0$ for F 2 fluidic stream with diffusivity D [3, 15, 16].…”
Section: Mathematical Model and Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, micromixers are categorized into two types of passive and active. , To mix the samples, passive micromixers use natural fluid behavior , while active micromixers resort to the disturbance caused by external forces. Despite the active micromixers typically having faster mixing than the passive ones, their integration into the lab-on-a-chip systems is challenging and often expensive . Moreover, the external sources, if not well-controlled, may damage the biological samples .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%