2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.09.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review on microelectrode recording selection of features for machine learning in deep brain stimulation surgery for Parkinson’s disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In DBS surgery for other diseases, targeting is commonly aided by microelectrode recordings (MERs), where electrode positions are refined intraoperatively according to neurophysiological ‘signatures’ of the stimulation target. For example, in Parkinson’s disease, MERs show that the subthalamic nucleus is distinguishable from surrounding structures by changes in neuronal spike firing and background noise 14. Comparatively few studies have assessed the utility of MERs in localising stimulation targets for epilepsy 15…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In DBS surgery for other diseases, targeting is commonly aided by microelectrode recordings (MERs), where electrode positions are refined intraoperatively according to neurophysiological ‘signatures’ of the stimulation target. For example, in Parkinson’s disease, MERs show that the subthalamic nucleus is distinguishable from surrounding structures by changes in neuronal spike firing and background noise 14. Comparatively few studies have assessed the utility of MERs in localising stimulation targets for epilepsy 15…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The topic of STN localization accuracy using electrophysiology has been studied in the literature, and several techniques have been implemented (e.g., [11]- [13]). A complete review survey has been published recently on all the studies conducted so far that used different feature extraction techniques and machine learning algorithms for localizing the STN nucleus [14]. In [14], Wan et al, have reported a complete summary of the state-of-the-art algorithms that have achieved good accuracies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in order to improve the efficiency and speed up this critical intra-operative localization step, many studies have focused on the automation of STN detection using MER data. These studies extracted temporal or frequency relevant features [12][13] [14][15] [16], leaving out potential additional informative features. However, the use of handdesigned descriptive features is limited by the need for normalization and extraction from the raw data, which can be problematic across centers and MER acquisition protocols.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%