A review on gasification and pyrolysis of waste plastics

Abstract

Gasification and pyrolysis are thermal processes for converting carbonaceous substances into tar, ash, coke, char, and gas. Pyrolysis produces products such as char, tar, and gas, while gasification transforms carbon-containing products (e.g., the products from pyrolysis) into a primarily gaseous product. The composition of the products and their relative quantities are highly dependent on the configuration of the overall process and on the input fuel. Although in gasification, pyrolysis processes also occur in many cases (yet prior to the gasification processes), gasification is a common description for the overall technology. Pyrolysis, on the other hand, can be used without going through the gasification process. The current study evaluates the most common waste plastics valorization routes for producing gaseous and liquid products, as well as the key process specifications that affected the end final products. The reactor type, temperatures, residence time, pressure, the fluidizing gas type, the flow rate, and catalysts were all investigated in this study. Pyrolysis and waste gasification, on the other hand, are expected to become more common in the future. One explanation for this is that public opinion on the incineration of waste in some countries is a main impediment to the development of new incineration capacity. However, an exceptional capability of gasification and pyrolysis over incineration to conserve waste chemical energy is also essential.

Thermochemical Valorization of Waste Plastic for Production of Synthetic Fuels, Fine Chemicals, and Carbon Nanotubes

“…The water used in the HTL process can serve different roles (solvent, catalyst, and reactant) and involves a series of hydrothermal cracking, hydrolysis, free radical reaction, nucleophilic substitution, and cyclization reactions. − The products obtained are mostly liquid hydrocarbon oils, with a significant moisture content Table shows the major advantages and disadvantages of the three processes with plastic as a feedstock. …”

Toward Building Circularity in Sustainable Plastic Waste Conversion

“…44 Additionally, the complexity of recycling PVC is attributed to the presence of chlorine. 37 To compare the profitability and degree of circularity of the optimal technology, 20 different scenarios are considered for model validation and analysis, as represented in Figure 4. The baseline approach in this study involves energy recovery through the incineration of mixed plastic waste without any prior sorting or separations.…”

Catalytic Consequences of Hierarchical Pore Architectures within MFI and FAU Zeolites for Polyethylene Conversion

“…While mechanical recycling remains the most prevalent way of recycling solid plastic waste, , it is typically limited to high-purity plastic waste, since the presence of contaminants and additives within the waste mixture will degrade the final quality of the recycled products. , More recently, thermochemical recycling has been touted as a prospective solution that can address certain shortcomings of mechanical recycling, while still providing environmental advantages over landfilling and incineration. − Regardless of the thermochemical recycling technology (e.g., gasification or pyrolysis), the utilization of catalysts within these processes lowers the reaction temperature required to attain a similar degree of polymer deconstruction or product yields. − Furthermore, catalysts, particularly ones with size-and-shape selectivity, i.e., zeolites, can also enable fine-tuning of the final product distribution and allow for higher selectivity to desired, high-value products.…”