2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.indic.2022.100174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review on freshwater biomonitoring with benthic invertebrates in Ethiopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The range of possible scores for the Lao MMI was determined by the minimum and maximum scores from <13 to ≥53. The range of the Lao MMI was then quadrisected in order to establish the five classes of water quality assessment; excellent condition (score ≥ 53), which pertained to the desired reference biological condition with a low degree of alteration in biological integrity; good (49)(50)(51)(52) with good water quality and slightly disturbed biological integrity; fair (25-48) with fair quality of water and moderately disturbed biological integrity; poor (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24), with poor quality of water and highly disturbed biological integrity, and impaired condition (score < 13) with very poor water quality and severe impairment of biological integrity (Table 7).…”
Section: Development Of Lao MMImentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The range of possible scores for the Lao MMI was determined by the minimum and maximum scores from <13 to ≥53. The range of the Lao MMI was then quadrisected in order to establish the five classes of water quality assessment; excellent condition (score ≥ 53), which pertained to the desired reference biological condition with a low degree of alteration in biological integrity; good (49)(50)(51)(52) with good water quality and slightly disturbed biological integrity; fair (25-48) with fair quality of water and moderately disturbed biological integrity; poor (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24), with poor quality of water and highly disturbed biological integrity, and impaired condition (score < 13) with very poor water quality and severe impairment of biological integrity (Table 7).…”
Section: Development Of Lao MMImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these methods are insufficient in assessing the consequences of certain human disturbances, as they only reflect the water quality at the time and place of sampling and do not directly measure the biological response to pollution [11,12]. Therefore, physicochemical methods cannot detect biogeochemical changes that occur in aquatic ecosystems over an extended period of time [13]. On the other hand, biomonitoring methods can reflect the consequences of changes in water quality and the biological response to human disturbance and pollution, both in the past and present [12,[14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Monitoring of biological indicators is very important and useful for detecting impacts from anthropogenic pressures on aquatic ecosystems [1]. Indeed, the use of bioindicators provide better information than physico-chemical variables on ecosystem conditions, as organisms used in biomonitoring assessment can either integrate the biogeochemical changes within the ecosystem, or respond to several stresses over a long period of time [2]. To assess the potential toxic effects arising from environmental exposure to chemicals, information on their bioaccumulation in biota is essential, since they can provide information on their bioavailability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%