Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2017
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/165/1/012006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A review on fracture prevention of stent in femoropopliteal artery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[25] Furthermore, the outcomes after popliteal stenting with the Supera stent from the Leipzing Supera popliteal artery registry showed 6and 12-month primary patency rate of 94.6% and 87.7%, respectively, with 4 patients experiencing in-stent occlusions and 6 patients experiencing in-stent restenosis [26] Optimizing stent design can improve stent performance. [27] The length of the SENS is also an important factor of ISR. Long stenosis (> 100 mm) had poor outcome, with restenosis rate exceeding 70% at 1 year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25] Furthermore, the outcomes after popliteal stenting with the Supera stent from the Leipzing Supera popliteal artery registry showed 6and 12-month primary patency rate of 94.6% and 87.7%, respectively, with 4 patients experiencing in-stent occlusions and 6 patients experiencing in-stent restenosis [26] Optimizing stent design can improve stent performance. [27] The length of the SENS is also an important factor of ISR. Long stenosis (> 100 mm) had poor outcome, with restenosis rate exceeding 70% at 1 year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%